• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复团队、康复患者及其重要他人对亚急性卒中幸存者功能状况看法的差异:图尔库国际功能、残疾和健康分类研究

Differences between rehabilitation team, rehabilitants, and significant others in opinions on functioning of subacute stroke survivors: Turku ICF study.

作者信息

Saltychev Mikhail, Tarvonen-Schröder Sinikka, Bärlund Esa, Laimi Katri

机构信息

Departments of aPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine bRehabilitation and Brain Trauma, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku cSatakunta University of Applied Sciences, Pori, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Sep;37(3):229-35. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000065.

DOI:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000065
PMID:24802977
Abstract

To assess quantitative differences between rehabilitation team, rehabilitants, and significant others in opinions on functioning of subacute stroke survivors. During inpatient interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation, the interdisciplinary team, nurses, rehabilitants, and significant others reported their opinions on the functioning of consecutive 62 rehabilitants. Data were gathered using the structured form based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Brief Core Set for Stroke. Agreement between observers on the presence and severity of restrictions in functioning was analyzed. The strongest agreement between different observers on all studied ICF categories was achieved between the interdisciplinary team and nurses (weighted squared κ=0.7-0.9). The weakest agreement was detected between the team and rehabilitants (weighted squared κ=0.1-0.6). Support by family was found to be an important facilitating factor of functioning by all observers. Limitations in cognitive activity were identified less frequently than other restrictions. Opinions on restrictions in functioning may differ between the interdisciplinary team, rehabilitants, and significant others. These differences can be assessed quantitatively and documented using the ICF Core Set for Stroke. This potential observer-dependent discrepancy should be taken into account during the process of neurorehabilitation.

摘要

评估康复团队、康复患者及其重要他人对亚急性卒中幸存者功能状况看法的定量差异。在住院期间的跨学科神经康复过程中,跨学科团队、护士、康复患者及其重要他人报告了他们对连续62名康复患者功能状况的看法。使用基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)中风简要核心集的结构化表格收集数据。分析了观察者之间在功能受限的存在和严重程度方面的一致性。在所有研究的ICF类别中,跨学科团队和护士之间不同观察者之间的一致性最强(加权平方κ=0.7 - 0.9)。团队与康复患者之间的一致性最弱(加权平方κ=0.1 - 0.6)。所有观察者均发现家庭支持是功能发挥的重要促进因素。认知活动受限的识别频率低于其他限制。跨学科团队、康复患者及其重要他人对功能受限的看法可能存在差异。这些差异可以使用ICF中风核心集进行定量评估和记录。在神经康复过程中应考虑这种潜在的观察者依赖性差异。

相似文献

1
Differences between rehabilitation team, rehabilitants, and significant others in opinions on functioning of subacute stroke survivors: Turku ICF study.康复团队、康复患者及其重要他人对亚急性卒中幸存者功能状况看法的差异:图尔库国际功能、残疾和健康分类研究
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Sep;37(3):229-35. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000065.
2
Change in agreement between stroke survivors and their significant others on the severity of restrictions of functioning in a 1-year follow-up.在为期1年的随访中,中风幸存者与其重要他人在功能受限严重程度方面的一致性变化。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Dec;38(4):327-32. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000130.
3
Selecting an optimal abbreviated ICF set for clinical practice among rehabilitants with subacute stroke: retrospective analysis of patient records.为亚急性卒中康复患者临床实践选择最佳简化版国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)组合:患者记录的回顾性分析
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Jun;36(2):172-7. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835e9c4f.
4
The feasibility and validity of the comprehensive ICF core set for stroke in Chinese clinical settings.中文临床环境下脑卒中综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的可行性和有效性。
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Feb;28(2):159-71. doi: 10.1177/0269215513496659. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Responsiveness of the functioning and disability parts of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health core sets in postacute stroke patients.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》核心集功能与残疾部分在急性卒中后患者中的反应性
Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Sep;40(3):246-253. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000235.
6
Content validation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for stroke from gender perspective using a qualitative approach.从性别视角采用定性方法对国际功能、残疾和健康分类中风核心集进行内容效度验证。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Jun;50(3):285-99. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
7
Concepts of capacity and performance in assessment of functioning amongst stroke survivors: A comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.中风幸存者功能评估中的能力与表现概念:功能独立性测量与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的比较
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug 18;47(7):662-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1974.
8
Interrater reliability of the extended ICF core set for stroke applied by physical therapists.物理治疗师应用的中风扩展版国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的评分者间信度。
Phys Ther. 2008 Jul;88(7):841-51. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070211. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Identification of the components associated with functioning using the international classification of functioning, disability and health comprehensive core set for stroke in Indian stroke survivors.运用国际功能、残疾和健康分类中风综合核心集,识别印度中风幸存者中与功能相关的组成部分。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Oct;24(7):517-526. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1330231. Epub 2017 May 25.
10
Functioning of stroke survivors--A validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden.中风幸存者的功能--瑞典中风国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(7):551-9. doi: 10.3109/09638280903186335.

引用本文的文献

1
Value of using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health for stroke rehabilitation assessment: A multicenter clinical study.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》进行中风康复评估的价值:一项多中心临床研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12802. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012802.