Suppr超能文献

病态肥胖对机器人辅助妇科手术手术结局的影响

Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

作者信息

Eddib Abeer, Danakas Alexandra, Hughes Shawna, Erk Mehmet, Michalik Caroline, Narayanan Madusudanan Sathia, Krovi Venkat, Singhal Pankaj

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University at Buffalo , Williamsville, NY. ; Department of Robotic Surgery, Kaleida Health, Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital , Williamsville, NY.

Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University at Buffalo , Williamsville, NY.

出版信息

J Gynecol Surg. 2014 Apr 1;30(2):81-86. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2012.0142.

Abstract

The aim of this research was to estimate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort data for a consecutive series of patients undergoing gynecologic robotic surgery in a single institution. BMI, expressed as kg/m, was abstracted from the medical charts of all patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy. Data on estimated blood loss (EBL), hemoglobin (Hb) drop, procedure time, length of hospital stay, uterine weight, pain-medication use, and complications were also extracted. Two hundred and eighty-one patients underwent robotic operations. Types of procedures were total hysterectomy with or without adnexal excision, and total hysterectomies with lymphadenectomies. Eighty-four patients who were classified as morbidly obese (BMI>35) were compared with 197 patients who had a BMI of<35 (nonmorbidly obese). For patients with BMI<35, and BMI>35, the mean BMI was 27.1 and 42.5 kg/m (<0.05), mean age was 49 and 50 (=0.45), mean total operative time was 222 and 266 minutes (<0.05), console time 115 and 142 minutes (<0.05), closing time (from undocking until port-site fascia closure) was 30 and 41 minutes (<0.05), EBL was 67 and 79 mL (=0.27), Hb drop was 1.6 and 1.4 (=0.28), uterine weight was 196.2 and 227 g (=0.52), pain-medication use 93.7 and 111 mg of morphine (=0.46), and mean length of stay was 1.42 and 1.43 days (0.9), all respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between the 2 groups for EBL, Hb drop, LOS, uterine weight, pain-medication use, or complications. The only statistically significant difference was seen in operating times and included docking, console, closing, and procedure times. There were no perioperative mortalities. Morbidity occurred in 24 patients (8%). In the morbidly obese group, there were 6 complications (7%) and, in the nonmorbidly obese group, there were 18 complications (9%). Morbid obesity does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of morbidity in patients undergoing robotically assisted gynecologic surgery. Morbid obesity is associated with increased procedure time, but otherwise appears to have no difference in outcomes. Robotic surgery offered an ideal approach, allowing minimally invasive surgery in these technically challenging patients, with no significant increase in morbidity. J GYNECOL SURG 30:81).

摘要

本研究的目的是评估体重指数(BMI)对接受机器人辅助妇科手术患者手术结局的影响。本研究是对在单一机构接受妇科机器人手术的一系列连续患者的前瞻性收集队列数据进行的回顾性分析。BMI以kg/m²表示,从所有接受机器人子宫切除术患者的病历中提取。还提取了估计失血量(EBL)、血红蛋白(Hb)下降、手术时间、住院时间、子宫重量、止痛药物使用情况及并发症的数据。281例患者接受了机器人手术。手术类型包括全子宫切除术(有或无附件切除术)以及全子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术。将84例被归类为病态肥胖(BMI>35)的患者与197例BMI<35(非病态肥胖)的患者进行比较。对于BMI<35和BMI>35的患者,平均BMI分别为27.1和42.5kg/m²(P<0.05),平均年龄分别为49岁和50岁(P=0.45),平均总手术时间分别为222分钟和266分钟(P<0.05),控制台操作时间分别为115分钟和142分钟(P<0.05),关闭时间(从分离器械直至关闭穿刺孔筋膜)分别为30分钟和41分钟(P<0.05),EBL分别为67mL和79mL(P=0.27),Hb下降分别为1.6和1.4(P=0.28),子宫重量分别为196.2g和227g(P=0.52),止痛药物使用量分别为93.7mg和111mg吗啡(P=0.46),平均住院时间分别为1.42天和1.43天(P=0.9)。两组在EBL、Hb下降、住院时间、子宫重量、止痛药物使用或并发症方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。唯一具有统计学显著差异的是手术时间,包括对接时间、控制台操作时间、关闭时间和总手术时间。无围手术期死亡病例。24例患者(8%)发生了并发症。在病态肥胖组,有6例并发症(7%),在非病态肥胖组,有18例并发症(9%)。病态肥胖似乎与接受机器人辅助妇科手术患者的并发症风险增加无关。病态肥胖与手术时间延长有关,但在其他方面似乎对结局没有影响。机器人手术提供了一种理想的方法,能够在这些技术上具有挑战性的患者中进行微创手术,且并发症无显著增加。《妇科手术杂志》30:81)

相似文献

1
Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
J Gynecol Surg. 2014 Apr 1;30(2):81-86. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2012.0142.
2
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Optimizing Robotic Hysterectomy for the Patient Who Is Morbidly Obese with a Surgical Safety Pathway.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Dec;28(12):2052-2059.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):323-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):903-907. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01074-7. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Saturation of respiratory strain during robotic hysterectomy in obese women with endometrial cancer.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 6;19(1):567. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02739-x.
3
Impact of uterine weight on surgical outcomes in robotic hysterectomy: An ambispective analysis.
J Minim Access Surg. 2024 Jul 30. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_125_24.
6
Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients.
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Jun 4;19(2):72-77. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2018.0018. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Early Experience of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Uterine Disease.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;38(9):450-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592345. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3680-7. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
Robotic surgery in gynecology.
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic surgery in the obese gynecologic patient.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;54(3):420-30. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b37b1.
2
Relationship between body mass index and robotic surgery outcomes of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 May;21(4):722-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318212981d.
3
Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
4
Surgical steps that elongate operative time in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the obese population.
J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):793-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0428. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
5
Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;282(5):539-45. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1593-z. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
6
Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):535-542. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological cancers in obese women.
Maturitas. 2010 Apr;65(4):320-4. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
8
Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):730-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.07.014.
9
Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;114(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aa96c7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验