• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗大子宫患者:5 家社区实践的结果。

Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.

机构信息

From Ochsner Health Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, New Jersey; Hackensack Medical Center, New Jersey; Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, South Carolina; Mount Carmel Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Mercy Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Stanford University School of Medicine, California.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):535-542. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad
PMID:20177284
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with benign conditions involving high uterine weight and complex pathology.

METHODS

A multicenter study was undertaken in five community practice settings across the United States. All patients who had minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy with robotic assistance March 2006 through July 2009 and uterine weights of at least 250 g were included. Retrospective chart review identified outcomes including skin-to-skin operative time, conversion to an exploratory laparotomy, blood loss, complications, and hospital duration of stay. The effect of uterine weight on skin-to-skin time and blood loss also was examined.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 256 patients with uteri weighing 250 to 3,020 g (median 453 g). Most patients were obese or had a history of pelvic or abdominal surgery. Median operative time was 145 minutes. Duration of surgery in patients with uteri 500 g or greater was significantly longer than in patients with uteri less than 500 g (167 compared with 126 minutes, P<.001). Median estimated blood loss also was greater in women with uteri weighing 500 g or more (100 compared with 50 mL, P<.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis confirmed the independent effect of uterine weight on operative time and blood loss. Median duration of hospital stay was 1 day. The conversion rate was 1.6%, the minor complication rate was 1.6%, and major complications occurred in 2.0% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Women with large uteri may successfully undergo robotically assisted hysterectomy with low morbidity, low blood loss, and minimal risk of conversion to laparotomy. Results were reproducible among general gynecologists from geographically diverse community settings.

摘要

目的

研究机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗涉及高子宫重量和复杂病理的良性疾病患者的结局。

方法

在美国五个社区实践地点进行了一项多中心研究。所有于 2006 年 3 月至 2009 年 7 月接受微创腹腔镜子宫切除术且有机器人辅助、子宫重量至少为 250 克的患者均被纳入研究。回顾性病历分析确定了包括皮肤对皮肤手术时间、转为剖腹探查术、出血量、并发症和住院时间在内的结局。还检查了子宫重量对皮肤对皮肤时间和出血量的影响。

结果

对 256 名子宫重量为 250 至 3020 克(中位数 453 克)的患者进行了数据分析。大多数患者肥胖或有盆腔或腹部手术史。中位手术时间为 145 分钟。子宫重量为 500 克或以上的患者手术时间明显长于子宫重量小于 500 克的患者(167 分钟比 126 分钟,P<.001)。子宫重量为 500 克或以上的患者估计出血量中位数也更大(100 毫升比 50 毫升,P<.001)。多变量线性回归分析证实了子宫重量对手术时间和出血量的独立影响。中位住院时间为 1 天。转化率为 1.6%,轻微并发症发生率为 1.6%,主要并发症发生率为 2.0%。

结论

子宫较大的女性可以成功接受机器人辅助子宫切除术,具有较低的发病率、较低的出血量和较低的剖腹手术风险。来自地理位置不同的社区实践的普通妇科医生的结果是可重复的。

相似文献

1
Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗大子宫患者:5 家社区实践的结果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):535-542. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad.
2
Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing from 1.5 kg to 11.000 kg.对于重量为 1.5 千克至 11.000 千克的子宫,行全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性和安全性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05799-6. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
3
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
4
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.机器人辅助与经腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):400-6. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗 >1kg 良性子宫疾病的比较:258 例回顾性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.子宫重量与经腹、腹腔镜和经阴道子宫切除术的并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):480.e1-480.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Association Between Body Mass Index, Uterine Size, and Operative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.接受微创子宫切除术的女性的体重指数、子宫大小与手术并发症之间的关联
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1113-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Uteri Greater Than One Kilogram.针对大于一千克子宫的微创子宫切除术
JSLS. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00098.
9
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
10
Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing ≥1 kilogram: a series of 71 cases and review of the literature.子宫重量≥1千克时的腹腔镜子宫切除术:71例病例系列及文献综述
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.706. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of robotic hysterectomy for large uterus weighing more than 1000 g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center.子宫重量超过1000克的大型子宫机器人子宫切除术的手术结果:来自高容量中心的回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02422-1.
2
Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.子宫重量对良性指征下机器人辅助子宫切除术手术结局的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56602. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人辅助良性子宫切除术与腹腔镜、阴道和开腹手术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2647-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01724-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
4
Hysterectomy in benign conditions: a 20-year single-center retrospective on the development of surgical techniques.良性疾病中的子宫切除术:20 年单中心回顾性研究手术技术的发展。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06821-9. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Indications of Uteri Less Than Fourteen Weeks Size Versus More Than Fourteen Weeks Size: A Comparative Study.机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗孕周小于14周与大于14周子宫良性疾病的比较研究
Cureus. 2021 May 26;13(5):e15263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15263.
6
Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?良性指征的机器人子宫切除术:十年间我们学到了什么?
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00091.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术;早期手术结果比较
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020 Dec 4;21(4):260-264. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0187. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015).良性疾病子宫切除术的适应症及手术途径。德国妇科和产科学会(DGGG)、奥地利妇科和产科学会(OEGGG)及瑞士妇科和产科学会(SGGG)指南(S3级,德国医学科学院质量与效率委员会登记号015/070,2015年4月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Apr;76(4):350-364. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104288.
9
Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes.机器人手术:最新进展、风险及结果综述
J Robot Surg. 2011 Jun;5(2):79-97. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0246-y. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
10
Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy.预防性多模式镇痛有利于机器人辅助子宫切除术后当天出院。
J Robot Surg. 2012 Jun;6(2):115-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0276-5. Epub 2011 May 28.