• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配偶过度保护通过低水平的积极参与时的糖尿病困扰与 2 型糖尿病患者较差的饮食依从性间接相关。

Spousal overprotection is indirectly associated with poorer dietary adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes via diabetes distress when active engagement is low.

机构信息

Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):360-73. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12105. Epub 2014 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12105
PMID:24806751
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current study sought to explore the indirect association of spousal overprotection on patient dietary adherence through the mechanism of diabetes distress and whether the link between overprotection and diabetes distress was moderated by spouse active engagement.

METHOD

Participants were 117 married couples in which one member had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and were recruited from a patient registry at a Midwestern (USA) medical centre. Data were gathered from spouses and patients through a self-report survey instrument. The research questions were answered with structural equation modelling using the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach and dyadic data analytic procedures.

RESULTS

Overprotection was associated with reduced dietary adherence indirectly via increased diabetes distress only at low levels of active engagement. The proposed model also proved superior when compared to two plausible alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the importance of understanding the nuanced associations among the different ways spouses cope with illness to achieve better diabetes outcomes and the mechanisms responsible for linking coping and dietary adherence. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Spousal coping behaviour can influence dietary adherence among patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, positively and negatively. Spouses simultaneously engage in different ways of coping with partner illness, but little is known about the interactive nature of coping styles or possible mechanisms that might link coping with illness outcomes. What does this study add? Spousal overprotection is only associated with reduced patient dietary adherence when spouses are also engaging in low levels of active engagement. Diabetes distress is an important mechanism linking spousal coping with patient dietary adherence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨配偶过度保护通过糖尿病困扰这一机制对患者饮食依从性的间接影响,以及过度保护与糖尿病困扰之间的联系是否受到配偶积极参与的调节。

方法

参与者为来自美国中西部一家医疗中心患者登记处的 117 对已婚夫妇,其中一方被诊断患有 2 型糖尿病。数据通过自我报告调查工具从配偶和患者处收集。使用潜在调节结构方程(LMS)方法和对偶数据分析程序,通过结构方程模型回答研究问题。

结果

仅在配偶积极参与程度较低的情况下,过度保护与糖尿病困扰的增加呈间接负相关,进而与饮食依从性的降低间接相关。与两种合理的替代方案相比,提出的模型也表现出优越性。

结论

这些发现强调了理解配偶以不同方式应对疾病的细微关联对于实现更好的糖尿病结果的重要性,以及联系应对方式和饮食依从性的潜在机制。

研究贡献 关于这个主题,目前已经知道什么? 配偶的应对行为会对被诊断患有 2 型糖尿病的患者的饮食依从性产生积极和消极的影响。配偶同时以不同的方式应对伴侣的疾病,但对于应对方式的相互作用性质或可能将应对与疾病结果联系起来的潜在机制知之甚少。 这项研究有什么新发现? 只有当配偶也表现出低度积极参与时,配偶过度保护才与患者饮食依从性降低有关。糖尿病困扰是将配偶应对与患者饮食依从性联系起来的一个重要机制。

相似文献

1
Spousal overprotection is indirectly associated with poorer dietary adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes via diabetes distress when active engagement is low.配偶过度保护通过低水平的积极参与时的糖尿病困扰与 2 型糖尿病患者较差的饮食依从性间接相关。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):360-73. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12105. Epub 2014 May 8.
2
Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy.常见的对偶应对方式通过患者和伴侣的糖尿病效能,间接地与饮食和运动依从性相关。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Oct;27(5):722-730. doi: 10.1037/a0034006. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
3
Spousal protective buffering and type 2 diabetes outcomes.配偶的保护性缓冲作用与2型糖尿病结局
Health Psychol. 2014 Aug;33(8):841-844. doi: 10.1037/hea0000054. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
4
Evaluative coping, emotional distress, and adherence in couples with Type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病夫妇的评估性应对、情绪困扰与依从性
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Mar;36(1):87-96. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000302. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Relationship beliefs and illness appraisals are differentially associated with specific ways of coping in spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes.关系信念和疾病评估与 2 型糖尿病患者配偶特定的应对方式相关。
Psychol Health. 2013;28(12):1442-59. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.822499. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Table for two: diabetes distress and diet-related interactions of married patients with diabetes and their spouses.二人餐桌:糖尿病患者及其配偶的糖尿病困扰与饮食相关的相互影响
Fam Syst Health. 2012 Jun;30(2):154-65. doi: 10.1037/a0028614.
7
Does Personality Matter in Diabetes Adherence? Exploring the Pathways between Neuroticism and Patient Adherence in Couples with Type 2 Diabetes.人格特质对糖尿病治疗依从性有影响吗?探索2型糖尿病夫妇中神经质与患者依从性之间的关联路径。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2017 Jul;9(2):207-227. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12087. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
A dyadic multiple mediation model of patient and spouse stressors predicting patient dietary and exercise adherence via depression symptoms and diabetes self-efficacy.一个二元多重中介模型,该模型通过抑郁症状和糖尿病自我效能感,由患者和配偶压力源预测患者的饮食和运动依从性。
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):1020-1032. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9796-9. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
The association between regulatory focus and distress in patients with a chronic disease: the moderating role of partner support.调节焦点与慢性病患者痛苦之间的关系:伴侣支持的调节作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):63-78. doi: 10.1348/135910709X429091. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
Problem-solving and distress in prostate cancer patients and their spousal caregivers.前列腺癌患者及其配偶照顾者的问题解决与困扰
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Jun;13(6):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0748-5. Epub 2005 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrusive social support among Black and White individuals with type 2 diabetes: A "Control issue" or a sign of "Concern and love"?2 型糖尿病患者中的黑人及白人受到的侵扰性社会支持:是“控制问题”还是“关心与爱”的表现?
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 8;18(8):e0288258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288258. eCollection 2023.
2
Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Chronic Physical Illness: A Systematic Review.慢性身体疾病夫妻的二元应对:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 25;12:722740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740. eCollection 2021.
3
Factors Determining the Success of Therapeutic Lifestyle Interventions in Diabetes - Role of Partner and Family Support.
决定糖尿病治疗性生活方式干预成功的因素——伴侣及家庭支持的作用
Eur Endocrinol. 2019 Apr;15(1):18-24. doi: 10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.18. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature.夫妻间的二元应对:概念整合与实证文献综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571. eCollection 2019.
5
Associations Between Economic Pressure and Diabetes Efficacy in Couples With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病夫妇的经济压力与糖尿病疗效之间的关联
Fam Relat. 2017 Apr;66(2):273-286. doi: 10.1111/fare.12246. Epub 2017 Jul 19.