Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
J Virol. 2014 Jul;88(14):8028-44. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00722-14. Epub 2014 May 7.
The lytic cycles of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) are induced in cell culture by sodium butyrate (NaB), a short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. Valproic acid (VPA), another SCFA and an HDAC inhibitor, induces the lytic cycle of KSHV but blocks EBV lytic reactivation. To explore the hypothesis that structural differences between NaB and VPA account for their functional effects on the two related viruses, we investigated the capacity of 16 structurally related short- and medium-chain fatty acids to promote or prevent lytic cycle reactivation. SCFAs differentially affected EBV and KSHV reactivation. KSHV was reactivated by all SCFAs that are HDAC inhibitors, including phenylbutyrate. However, several fatty acid HDAC inhibitors, such as isobutyrate and phenylbutyrate, did not reactivate EBV. Reactivation of KSHV lytic transcripts could not be blocked completely by any fatty acid tested. In contrast, several medium-chain fatty acids inhibited lytic activation of EBV. Fatty acids that blocked EBV reactivation were more lipophilic than those that activated EBV. VPA blocked activation of the BZLF1 promoter by NaB but did not block the transcriptional function of ZEBRA. VPA also blocked activation of the DNA damage response that accompanies EBV lytic cycle activation. Properties of SCFAs in addition to their effects on chromatin are likely to explain activation or repression of EBV. We concluded that fatty acids stimulate the two related human gammaherpesviruses to enter the lytic cycle through different pathways. Importance: Lytic reactivation of EBV and KSHV is needed for persistence of these viruses and plays a role in carcinogenesis. Our direct comparison highlights the mechanistic differences in lytic reactivation between related human oncogenic gammaherpesviruses. Our findings have therapeutic implications, as fatty acids are found in the diet and produced by the human microbiota. Small-molecule inducers of the lytic cycle are desired for oncolytic therapy. Inhibition of viral reactivation, alternatively, may prove useful in cancer treatment. Overall, our findings contribute to the understanding of pathways that control the latent-to-lytic switch and identify naturally occurring molecules that may regulate this process.
EBV 和卡波氏肉瘤相关疱疹病毒(KSHV)的裂解周期可被细胞培养中的丁酸钠(NaB)诱导,NaB 是一种短链脂肪酸(SCFA)组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂。另一种 SCFA 和 HDAC 抑制剂丙戊酸(VPA)可诱导 KSHV 的裂解周期,但阻止 EBV 裂解再激活。为了探究 NaB 和 VPA 的结构差异是否导致它们对两种相关病毒产生功能效应的假说,我们研究了 16 种结构相关的短链和中链脂肪酸促进或阻止裂解周期再激活的能力。SCFA 对 EBV 和 KSHV 的再激活作用不同。所有 SCFA 都是 HDAC 抑制剂,包括苯丁酸钠,可使 KSHV 再激活。然而,几种脂肪酸 HDAC 抑制剂,如异丁酸和苯丁酸钠,不能使 EBV 再激活。用测试的任何脂肪酸都不能完全阻断 KSHV 裂解转录本的再激活。相反,几种中链脂肪酸抑制 EBV 的裂解激活。阻断 EBV 再激活的脂肪酸比激活 EBV 的脂肪酸更亲脂。VPA 阻断 NaB 激活 BZLF1 启动子,但不阻断 ZEBRA 的转录功能。VPA 还阻断了伴随 EBV 裂解周期激活的 DNA 损伤反应的激活。除了对染色质的影响外,SCFA 的性质可能解释了 EBV 的激活或抑制。我们得出结论,脂肪酸通过不同途径刺激两种相关的人类γ疱疹病毒进入裂解周期。
EBV 和 KSHV 的裂解再激活对于这些病毒的持续存在是必要的,并且在致癌作用中起作用。我们的直接比较突出了两种相关的人类致癌性γ疱疹病毒之间裂解再激活的机制差异。我们的发现具有治疗意义,因为脂肪酸存在于饮食中,并由人类微生物群产生。人们希望使用小分子诱导剂来进行溶瘤治疗。相反,抑制病毒再激活可能对癌症治疗有用。总的来说,我们的研究结果有助于理解控制潜伏到裂解开关的途径,并确定可能调节这一过程的天然存在的分子。