Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Virol. 2014 Jul;88(14):8139-52. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00425-14. Epub 2014 May 7.
Live attenuated cold-adapted (ca) H5N1, H7N3, H6N1, and H9N2 influenza vaccine viruses replicated in the respiratory tract of mice and ferrets, and 2 doses of vaccines were immunogenic and protected these animals from challenge infection with homologous and heterologous wild-type (wt) viruses of the corresponding subtypes. However, when these vaccine candidates were evaluated in phase I clinical trials, there were inconsistencies between the observations in animal models and in humans. The vaccine viruses did not replicate well and immune responses were variable in humans, even though the study subjects were seronegative with respect to the vaccine viruses before vaccination. Therefore, we sought a model that would better reflect the findings in humans and evaluated African green monkeys (AGMs) as a nonhuman primate model. The distribution of sialic acid (SA) receptors in the respiratory tract of AGMs was similar to that in humans. We evaluated the replication of wt and ca viruses of avian influenza (AI) virus subtypes H5N1, H6N1, H7N3, and H9N2 in the respiratory tract of AGMs. All of the wt viruses replicated efficiently, while replication of the ca vaccine viruses was restricted to the upper respiratory tract. Interestingly, the patterns and sites of virus replication differed among the different subtypes. We also evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of H5N1, H6N1, H7N3, and H9N2 ca vaccines. Protection from wt virus challenge correlated well with the level of serum neutralizing antibodies. Immune responses were slightly better when vaccine was delivered by both intranasal and intratracheal delivery than when it was delivered intranasally by sprayer. We conclude that live attenuated pandemic influenza virus vaccines replicate similarly in AGMs and human subjects and that AGMs may be a useful model to evaluate the replication of ca vaccine candidates. Importance: Ferrets and mice are commonly used for preclinical evaluation of influenza vaccines. However, we observed significant inconsistencies between observations in humans and in these animal models. We used African green monkeys (AGMs) as a nonhuman primate (NHP) model for a comprehensive and comparative evaluation of pairs of wild-type and pandemic live attenuated influenza virus vaccines (pLAIV) representing four subtypes of avian influenza viruses and found that pLAIVs replicate similarly in AGMs and humans and that AGMs can be useful for evaluation of the protective efficacy of pLAIV.
减毒活冷适应(ca)H5N1、H7N3、H6N1 和 H9N2 流感疫苗病毒在小鼠和雪貂的呼吸道中复制,两剂疫苗具有免疫原性,并保护这些动物免受同源和异源野生型(wt)相应亚型病毒的攻击感染。然而,当这些候选疫苗在 I 期临床试验中进行评估时,动物模型和人类观察结果之间存在不一致。疫苗病毒在人类中的复制效果不佳,免疫反应也各不相同,尽管研究对象在接种疫苗前对疫苗病毒呈血清阴性。因此,我们寻求一种更能反映人类发现的模型,并评估非洲绿猴(AGM)作为非人类灵长类动物模型。AGM 呼吸道中唾液酸(SA)受体的分布与人相似。我们评估了 wt 和 ca 病毒在 AGM 呼吸道中的复制,其中包括禽流感(AI)病毒亚型 H5N1、H6N1、H7N3 和 H9N2。所有 wt 病毒都能有效地复制,而 ca 疫苗病毒的复制仅限于上呼吸道。有趣的是,不同亚型的病毒复制模式和部位不同。我们还评估了 H5N1、H6N1、H7N3 和 H9N2 ca 疫苗的免疫原性和保护效力。对 wt 病毒攻击的保护与血清中和抗体水平密切相关。与通过喷雾器鼻内给药相比,通过鼻内和气管内给药时免疫反应略好。我们得出结论,减毒活大流行性流感病毒疫苗在 AGM 和人类中具有相似的复制能力,AGM 可能是评估 ca 疫苗候选物复制的有用模型。
雪貂和小鼠常用于流感疫苗的临床前评估。然而,我们在人类和这些动物模型中观察到了显著的不一致。我们使用非洲绿猴(AGM)作为非人类灵长类动物(NHP)模型,对代表四种禽流感病毒亚型的野生型和大流行减毒活流感病毒疫苗(pLAIV)对进行了全面和比较评估,发现 pLAIV 在 AGM 和人类中的复制情况相似,AGM 可用于评估 pLAIV 的保护效力。