Kazemipoor Maryam, Modaresi Jalil, Zandi Hengameh, Vasee Narges, Farzaneh Vaziri
Department of Endodontics, Shahid Sadooghi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadooghi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Jan;5(1):71-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.128670.
The purpose of this study was to compare microbial penetration method and electrochemical technique for evaluation of the apical seal.
A total of 28 teeth were prepared using the step-back technique to ISO size 40 master apical files. The specimens were randomly divided into an experimental group, two positive and two negative controls. Root canals in the experimental and negative control group were filled with gutta-percha (GP) and sealer, using lateral condensation technique. In the positive control group, canals were filled with GP without any sealer. The external surface of each tooth was coated with two layers of the nail varnish, except for the access opening and the apical foramen. In the negative control group, the teeth were completely covered with nail varnish. The apical seal was recorded with two methods, each successively used on the same teeth: An electrochemical method and a bacterial penetration method.
The correlation of the electro chemical readings with the results obtained from bacterial micro leakage test was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Correlation coefficient of the measurements obtained from the two evaluation methods, was 0.23 (r = 0.23), so the correlation was not statistically significant (P = 0.275).
This study shows that several studies by different methods are necessary before evaluation of the marginal leakage.
本研究旨在比较微生物渗透法和电化学技术在评估根尖封闭性方面的效果。
采用逐步后退技术将28颗牙齿预备至ISO 40号主尖锉。将标本随机分为实验组、两个阳性对照组和两个阴性对照组。实验组和阴性对照组的根管采用侧向加压技术用牙胶尖(GP)和封闭剂充填。阳性对照组的根管仅用牙胶尖充填,不使用任何封闭剂。除开髓孔和根尖孔外,每颗牙齿的外表面均涂两层指甲油。阴性对照组的牙齿则完全用指甲油覆盖。采用两种方法记录根尖封闭性,且每种方法依次应用于同一颗牙齿:电化学方法和细菌渗透法。
通过Pearson相关系数评估电化学读数与细菌微渗漏试验结果之间的相关性。
两种评估方法所得测量值的相关系数为0.23(r = 0.23),因此相关性无统计学意义(P = 0.275)。
本研究表明,在评估边缘渗漏之前,需要采用不同方法进行多项研究。