精神科预先指示，一种可能的克服强制和促进赋权的方式。
Psychiatric advance directives, a possible way to overcome coercion and promote empowerment.
机构信息
Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland ; Geneva University , Geneva , Switzerland.
Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland.
出版信息
Front Public Health. 2014 Apr 29;2:37. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00037. eCollection 2014.
Abstract
Psychiatric advance directives (ADs) allow an individual to state their preferences for future treatment at times when they may be unable to make considered decisions. There are differences in their form and legal value and the process associated with their use and completion. Several studies have now been completed to assess the impact of ADs on service use and coercion. Their results give a mixed picture but directives nevertheless have the potential to support the empowerment process, minimize experienced coercion, and improve coping strategies. These may in turn reduce the frequency of in-patient service use. Further studies on the different processes of facilitation involved and on different populations are necessary to improve our knowledge and use of these potentially powerful interventions.
摘要
精神科预先指示（AD）允许个人在可能无法做出深思熟虑的决定时，表达他们对未来治疗的偏好。它们在形式和法律价值上存在差异，其使用和完成过程也有所不同。目前已经完成了几项研究来评估 AD 对服务使用和强制的影响。他们的结果给出了一个混合的画面，但指令仍然有可能支持赋权过程，最大限度地减少所经历的强制，并改善应对策略。这反过来又可能减少住院服务的使用频率。为了提高我们对这些潜在有力干预措施的认识和使用，有必要对所涉及的不同促进过程和不同人群进行进一步研究。
相似文献
1
Psychiatric advance directives, a possible way to overcome coercion and promote empowerment.精神科预先指示，一种可能的克服强制和促进赋权的方式。
Front Public Health. 2014 Apr 29;2:37. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00037. eCollection 2014.
2
Advance directives based on cognitive therapy: a way to overcome coercion related problems.基于认知疗法的预先指示：一种克服强制相关问题的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.重症住院患者的预立医疗指示：《患者自主决定法案》及SUPPORT干预措施的效果。SUPPORT研究人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):500-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x.
4
Psychiatric advance directives: an alternative to coercive treatment?精神科预先指示：强制治疗的替代方案？
Psychiatry. 2000 Summer;63(2):160-72. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2000.11024908.
5
[Advanced directives in psychiatry: A review of the qualitative literature, a state-of-the-art and viewpoints].[精神病学中的预立医疗指示：定性文献综述、最新进展与观点]
Encephale. 2013 Sep;39(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.012. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.预立医嘱在临终资源节省方面的错觉。支持研究人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):513-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05180.x.
7
Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives.临床决策与对精神科预先指示的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):350-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350.
8
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示：一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.
9
Preferences for psychiatric advance directives among Latinos: views on advance care planning for mental health.拉丁裔人群对精神科预立医疗指示的偏好：对心理健康预先护理计划的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Oct;60(10):1383-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.10.1383.
10
Advance directives and power of attorney for health care in the oldest-old - results of the AgeQualiDe study.高龄老人的预先医疗指示和医疗保健委托书——AgeQualiDe研究结果
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0482-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Attitude about Euthanasia Scale in Portuguese Older Adults with Mixed Anxiety-Depressive Disorder.葡萄牙患有混合性焦虑抑郁障碍的老年人中安乐死态度量表的跨文化适应与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;12(12):1221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121221.
2
Relationship between perceived coercion and perceived justification of coercive measures - secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.感知到的强制与感知到的强制措施正当性之间的关系——一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05192-y.
3
Perceived Coercion of Persons with Mental Illness Living in a Community.社区中精神疾病患者的感知强迫。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052290.
4
5
Advance directives and nominated representatives: A critique.预立医疗指示与指定代表：一项批判性分析。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S680-S685. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_95_19.
6
Involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation, stigma stress and recovery: a 2-year study.非自愿住院治疗、污名压力与康复：一项为期两年的研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):458-465. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Coercion in mental healthcare: time for a change in direction.精神卫生保健中的强制手段：是时候改变方向了。
BJPsych Int. 2016 Feb 1;13(1):1-3. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000000854. eCollection 2016 Feb.
8
Preventing Compulsory Admission to Psychiatric Inpatient Care: Perceived Coercion, Empowerment, and Self-Reported Mental Health Functioning after 12 Months of Preventive Monitoring.预防强制入住精神科住院治疗：预防性监测12个月后的感知胁迫、赋权及自我报告的心理健康功能
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 18;6:161. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00161. eCollection 2015.
本文引用的文献
1
A review of barriers to using psychiatric advance directives in clinical practice.临床实践中使用精神科预嘱的障碍综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):753-66. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0523-3.
2
A prediction model for the incidence of civil detention for crisis patients with psychiatric illnesses; the Amsterdam study of acute psychiatry VII.精神疾病危机患者民事拘留发生率预测模型；阿姆斯特丹急性精神病学研究 VII。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;49(2):283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0742-7. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
3
Emotional reactions to involuntary psychiatric hospitalization and stigma-related stress among people with mental illness.精神疾病患者对非自愿住院治疗的情绪反应和与耻辱感相关的压力。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Feb;264(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00406-013-0412-5. Epub 2013 May 21.
4
Clinical outcomes of Joint Crisis Plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: a randomised controlled trial.联合危机计划减少精神病患者强制治疗的临床效果：一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1634-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60105-1. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Crisis plans facilitated by patient advocates are better than those drawn up by clinicians: results from an RCT.由患者权益倡导者推动制定的危机应对计划比临床医生制定的更好：一项随机对照试验的结果
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Mar;41(2):220-7. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0454-4.
6
Preventing compulsory admission to psychiatric inpatient care through psycho-education and crisis focused monitoring.通过心理教育和以危机为重点的监测来预防强制住院治疗。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 5;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-136.
7
Psychiatric Advance Directives as a complex and multistage intervention: a realist systematic review.精神科预先指示作为一种复杂的多阶段干预措施：一项现实主义系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jan;21(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01062.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
8
Pressures to adhere to treatment ('leverage') in English mental healthcare.英语心理保健治疗中的坚持治疗压力（“杠杆作用”）。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;199(2):145-50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.086827.
9
CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] protocol: a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis.CRIMSON [危机计划影响：主观和客观强制和参与]方案：一项减少精神病人强制治疗的联合危机计划随机对照试验。
Trials. 2010 Nov 5;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-102.
10
Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: findings from ten European countries.非自愿住院期间使用强制手段：来自十个欧洲国家的调查结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Oct;61(10):1012-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012.
Zotero 插件