Suppr超能文献

临床决策与对精神科预先指示的看法。

Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives.

作者信息

Elbogen Eric B, Swartz Marvin S, Van Dorn Richard, Swanson Jeffrey W, Kim Mimi, Scheyett Anna

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3071, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):350-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Psychiatric advance directives allow competent persons to document advance instructions or designate a health care agent to communicate their preferences for future mental health treatment in the event of an incapacitating crisis. Although laws authorizing psychiatric advance directives have proliferated, little is known about clinicians' understanding and perceptions of these legal tools.

METHODS

A total of 597 mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) completed a survey about their attitudes toward psychiatric advance directives and decision making about following such directives.

RESULTS

Approximately half the sample (47 percent) agreed that advance instructions would be helpful to consumers with severe mental illnesses, and a majority (57 percent) endorsed health care agents as beneficial. Regardless of profession, clinicians had more positive attitudes about psychiatric advance directives when they correctly recognized that they were not required by state law to follow directives that note the patient' s refusal of appropriate medical treatment. In multivariate analyses, the decision to abide by a patient' s advance refusal of treatment in a hypothetical scenario was predicted by knowing the laws associated with these directives, valuing family opinions about treatment, and respecting patient autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians correctly apprised of the state law were more likely to endorse psychiatric advance directives. Thus clinicians may be more willing to use directives if they are educated about the legal parameters of their implementation. The clinicians' profession had only an indirect influence on whether clinicians would follow an advance instruction that noted the patient's refusal of appropriate treatment; rather, clinicians' values and legal knowledge had the greatest effect, highlighting the potentially complex ethical dilemmas faced by mental health professionals who encounter these directives.

摘要

目标

精神科预先指示允许有行为能力的人记录预先指示,或指定一名医疗代理人,以便在丧失行为能力的危机发生时传达他们对未来心理健康治疗的偏好。尽管授权精神科预先指示的法律不断增多,但对于临床医生对这些法律工具的理解和看法却知之甚少。

方法

共有597名心理健康专业人员(精神科医生、心理学家和社会工作者)完成了一项关于他们对精神科预先指示的态度以及遵循此类指示进行决策的调查。

结果

大约一半的样本(47%)同意预先指示对患有严重精神疾病的患者有帮助,大多数(57%)认可医疗代理人是有益的。无论职业如何,当临床医生正确认识到州法律并不要求他们遵循那些记录患者拒绝接受适当医疗治疗的指示时,他们对精神科预先指示的态度更为积极。在多变量分析中,在假设情况下决定遵守患者预先拒绝治疗的情况,是由了解与这些指示相关的法律、重视家庭对治疗的意见以及尊重患者自主权来预测的。

结论

正确了解州法律的临床医生更有可能认可精神科预先指示。因此,如果临床医生接受了关于其实施的法律参数的教育,他们可能更愿意使用这些指示。临床医生的职业对他们是否会遵循记录患者拒绝接受适当治疗的预先指示只有间接影响;相反,临床医生的价值观和法律知识影响最大,这凸显了遇到这些指示的心理健康专业人员可能面临的潜在复杂伦理困境。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验