Wilde Frank, Winter Karsten, Kletsch Katharina, Lorenz Kai, Schramm Alexander
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm and Academic Hospital Ulm University, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 , Ulm, Germany,
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Feb;10(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s11548-014-1065-1. Epub 2014 May 9.
Mandible reconstruction with reconstruction plates requires bending the plates during the operation and fixation using the "standard method" (ST-method). The ST-method is limited when a pathological process has perforated the mandibular outer cortex. A transfer key method (TK-method) was developed where plates are pre-bent using a patient-specific mandible model and positioned on the mandible with the help of transfer keys. The ST-method and TK-method were compared in a clinical trial.
Mandibular reconstruction was performed on 42 patients in this study: 22 were performed using the TK-method and 20 using the ST-method. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were evaluated by measuring the distances between six corresponding landmarks on the mandibular condyles and rami. The difference between pre- and postoperative distances was used to evaluate reconstruction accuracy.
The median deviation of the unsigned/ absolute values of all six distances was 1.07 mm for the TK-method and 1.67 mm for the ST-method. The TK-method showed significantly better results. For the signed values, the median deviation of the six distances was -0.6 mm for the TK-method and -1.47 mm for the ST-method, indicating that the mandibles became narrower with both methods. This width difference was not statistically significant.
The TK-method was more accurate than the ST-method in a clinical trial. The TK-method was effective and accurate for mandible reconstruction using pre-bent fixation plates.
使用重建钢板进行下颌骨重建时,术中需要采用“标准方法”(ST法)对钢板进行弯曲和固定。当病理过程穿透下颌骨外皮质时,ST法存在局限性。因此开发了一种转移键方法(TK法),即使用患者特异性下颌骨模型对钢板进行预弯曲,并借助转移键将其放置在下颌骨上。在一项临床试验中对ST法和TK法进行了比较。
本研究对42例患者进行了下颌骨重建:22例采用TK法,20例采用ST法。通过测量下颌髁突和下颌支上六个相应标志点之间的距离,对术前和术后的CT扫描进行评估。术前和术后距离的差值用于评估重建精度。
TK法所有六个距离的无符号/绝对值的中位数偏差为1.07mm,ST法为1.67mm。TK法显示出明显更好的结果。对于有符号值,TK法六个距离的中位数偏差为-0.6mm,ST法为-1.47mm,表明两种方法都会使下颌骨变窄。这种宽度差异无统计学意义。
在一项临床试验中,TK法比ST法更准确。TK法对于使用预弯曲固定板进行下颌骨重建是有效且准确的。