Migueres Michel, Dávila Ignacio, Frati Franco, Azpeitia Angel, Jeanpetit Yasmine, Lhéritier-Barrand Michèle, Incorvaia Cristoforo, Ciprandi Giorgio
Service de Pneumologie et Allergologie, Clinique de L'Union, Saint-Jean, France.
Allergy Department, IBSAL, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Clin Transl Allergy. 2014 May 1;4:16. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-4-16. eCollection 2014.
The type of allergic sensitization is of central importance in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory allergic diseases. At least 10% of the general population (and more than 50% of patients consulting for respiratory allergies) are polysensitized. Here, we review the recent literature on (i) the concepts of polysensitization, paucisensitization, co-sensitization, co-recognition, cross-reactivity, cross-sensitization, and polyallergy, (ii) the prevalence of polysensitization and (iii) the relationships between sensitization status, disease severity and treatment strategies. In molecular terms, clinical polysensitization can be divided into cross-sensitization (also known as cross-reactivity, in which the same IgE molecule binds to several allergens with common structural features) and co-sensitization (the simultaneous presence of different IgEs binding to allergens that may not necessarily have common structural features). There is a strong overall association between sensitization in skin prick tests and total IgE values but there is debate as to whether IgE thresholds are useful guides to the presence or absence of clinical symptoms in individual cases. Molecular information from component-resolved techniques appears to be of value for diagnosis and treatment decisions. Polysensitization develops over time and is a risk factor for respiratory allergy (being associated with disease severity) and therefore has clinical relevance for treatment decisions. The subterm polysensitization has been defined as polysensitization to between two and four allergens. Polyallergy is defined as clinically confirmed allergy to two or more allergens. Single-allergen grass pollen allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and effective in polysensitized patients, whereas multi-allergen AIT requires more supporting evidence. Given that AIT may be more efficacious in moderate-to-severe disease than in mild disease, polysensitization could be an indication for this type of treatment. There is a need for flowcharts or decision trees for choosing the allergens for AIT in polysensitized patients and polyallergic patients.
过敏致敏类型在呼吸道过敏性疾病的诊断和治疗中至关重要。至少10%的普通人群(以及超过50%因呼吸道过敏而就诊的患者)为多重致敏。在此,我们回顾了近期关于以下方面的文献:(i)多重致敏、少量致敏、共同致敏、共同识别、交叉反应性、交叉致敏和多过敏的概念;(ii)多重致敏的患病率;(iii)致敏状态、疾病严重程度和治疗策略之间的关系。从分子角度来看,临床多重致敏可分为交叉致敏(也称为交叉反应性,即同一IgE分子结合具有共同结构特征的几种变应原)和共同致敏(不同IgE同时存在,结合不一定具有共同结构特征的变应原)。皮肤点刺试验中的致敏与总IgE值之间存在很强的总体关联,但对于IgE阈值是否可作为个别病例中临床症状存在与否的有用指导存在争议。来自组分分辨技术的分子信息似乎对诊断和治疗决策具有价值。多重致敏随时间发展,是呼吸道过敏的一个危险因素(与疾病严重程度相关),因此对治疗决策具有临床相关性。“多重致敏”这一术语已被定义为对两到四种变应原的致敏。多过敏被定义为临床上确诊对两种或更多种变应原过敏。单变应原草花粉变应原免疫疗法(AIT)在多重致敏患者中是安全有效的,而多变应原AIT需要更多的支持证据。鉴于AIT在中重度疾病中可能比轻度疾病更有效,多重致敏可能是这种治疗类型的一个指征。需要有流程图或决策树来为多重致敏患者和多过敏患者选择AIT的变应原。