Brunner Nathan W, Skhiri Mehdi, Fortenko Olga, Hsi Andrew, Haddad Francois, Khazeni Nayer, Zamanian Roham T
Vera Moulton Wall Center for Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Stanford, California; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Vera Moulton Wall Center for Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Stanford, California.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jul;33(7):721-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
Insulin resistance (IR) is an independent prognostic marker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), although the mechanism by which it engenders risk is unknown. We prospectively investigated the clinical, laboratory, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic characteristics of insulin-sensitive (IS) and IR patients with PAH.
This was a prospective cohort study including well-phenotyped patients with PAH proven at cardiac catheterization. Patients were classified as IS or IR on the basis of the well-validated triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio. Clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic characteristics were compared between cohorts. Distance walked on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and echocardiograms were compared between IS and IR for the sub-set of patients that had these tests within 1 month of cardiac catheterization.
Of the 111 PAH patients enrolled, 59 were IS, 25 were IR, and 27 were classified as indeterminate. Mean age was 45.8 ± 15.0 years. IR was associated with worse New York Heart Association class (p = 0.02). There were no differences in hemodynamics, biomarkers, 6MWT distance, or parameters of right ventricular function (i.e., tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, myocardial performance index, and fractional area change) between groups. Despite similar systemic vascular resistance, parameters of left ventricular diastolic function were more favorable for IS vs IR, including mitral inflow E wave velocity (82 ± 17 vs. 64 ± 19 msec, p = 0.02), E/A ratio (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2, p = 0.01), and lateral mitral valve E' velocity (13.9 ± 3.5 vs. 10.4 ± 2.2 msec, p = 0.01).
IR is associated with worse functional class and diastology compared with IS in PAH, although other prognostic parameters are similar.
胰岛素抵抗(IR)是肺动脉高压(PAH)的一个独立预后标志物,尽管其产生风险的机制尚不清楚。我们前瞻性地研究了PAH患者中胰岛素敏感(IS)和IR患者的临床、实验室、血流动力学和超声心动图特征。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了经心导管检查确诊的PAH患者,且患者特征明确。根据经过充分验证的甘油三酯/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值,将患者分为IS或IR。比较两组之间的临床、实验室和血流动力学特征。对在心脏导管检查后1个月内进行了6分钟步行试验(6MWT)和超声心动图检查的患者亚组,比较IS组和IR组的6MWT步行距离和超声心动图结果。
在纳入的111例PAH患者中,59例为IS,25例为IR,27例分类不确定。平均年龄为45.8±15.0岁。IR与纽约心脏协会心功能分级较差相关(p = 0.02)。两组之间的血流动力学、生物标志物、6MWT距离或右心室功能参数(即三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移、心肌性能指数和面积变化分数)无差异。尽管全身血管阻力相似,但与IR相比,IS的左心室舒张功能参数更有利,包括二尖瓣流入E波速度(82±17对64±19毫秒,p = 0.02)、E/A比值(1.2±0.4对0.8±0.2,p = 0.01)和二尖瓣外侧E'速度(13.9±3.5对10.4±2.2毫秒,p = 0.01)。
与PAH中的IS相比,IR与更差的心功能分级和舒张功能相关,尽管其他预后参数相似。