Nelson E Andrea, Hillman Alex, Thomas Kate
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Leeds, UK, LS2 9UT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 12;2014(5):CD001899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001899.pub4.
Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is a mechanical method of delivering compression to swollen limbs that can be used to treat venous leg ulcers and limb swelling due to lymphoedema.
To determine whether IPC increases the healing of venous leg ulcers. To determine the effects of IPC on health related quality of life of venous leg ulcer patients.
In April 2014, for this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of IPC with control (sham IPC or no IPC) or made comparisons between IPC treatment regimens, in venous ulcer management.
Two review authors reviewed titles and abstracts and agreed on full studies to be retrieved. One review author extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias and this was checked by a second review author.
We identified nine randomised controlled trials (including 489 people in total). Only one trial was at low risk of bias overall having reported adequate randomisation, allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment. In one trial (80 people) more ulcers healed with IPC than with dressings (62% vs 28%; p=0.002). Five trials compared IPC plus compression with compression alone. Two of these (97 people) found increased ulcer healing with IPC plus compression than with compression alone. The remaining three trials (122 people) found no evidence of a benefit for IPC plus compression compared with compression alone.Two trials (86 people) found no difference between IPC (without additional compression) and compression bandages alone.One trial (104 people) compared different ways of delivering IPC and found that rapid IPC healed more ulcers than slow IPC (86% vs 61%).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: IPC may increase healing compared with no compression. It is unclear whether it can be used instead of compression bandages. There is some limited evidence that IPC may improve healing when added to compression bandages. Rapid IPC was better than slow IPC in one trial. Further trials are required to determine the reliability of current evidence, which patients may benefit from IPC in addition to compression bandages, and the optimum treatment regimen.
间歇性气动压迫(IPC)是一种用于肿胀肢体的机械压迫方法,可用于治疗下肢静脉溃疡和淋巴水肿引起的肢体肿胀。
确定IPC是否能促进下肢静脉溃疡的愈合。确定IPC对下肢静脉溃疡患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
2014年4月,为进行本次第三次更新,我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库;Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆);Ovid MEDLINE;Ovid MEDLINE(在研及其他未索引引文);Ovid EMBASE;以及EBSCO CINAHL。
我们纳入了将IPC与对照(假IPC或无IPC)的效果进行比较,或在静脉溃疡管理中对IPC治疗方案进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位综述作者审查标题和摘要,并就拟检索的完整研究达成一致。一位综述作者提取数据并评估研究的偏倚风险,另一位综述作者进行核查。
我们确定了9项随机对照试验(共包括489人)。总体而言,只有1项试验偏倚风险较低,该试验报告了充分的随机化、分配隐藏和盲法结局评估。在1项试验(80人)中,接受IPC治疗的溃疡愈合人数多于接受敷料治疗的人数(62%对28%;p = 0.0第5项试验比较了IPC加压迫与单纯压迫。其中2项试验(97人)发现,IPC加压迫比单纯压迫能促进更多溃疡愈合。其余3项试验(122人)未发现IPC加压迫比单纯压迫有获益的证据。2项试验(86人)发现IPC(无额外压迫)与单纯压迫绷带之间无差异。1项试验(104人)比较了不同的IPC实施方式,发现快速IPC比慢速IPC能使更多溃疡愈合(86%对61%)。
与无压迫相比,IPC可能促进愈合。尚不清楚它是否可替代压迫绷带。有一些有限的证据表明,IPC加压迫绷带时可能改善愈合。在1项试验中,快速IPC优于慢速IPC。需要进一步试验来确定当前证据的可靠性、除压迫绷带外哪些患者可能从IPC中获益以及最佳治疗方案。