Suppr超能文献

践行“实用整体论”:英国非医学资质针灸师和顺势疗法从业者的专业化与整体论话语

Performing 'pragmatic holism': Professionalisation and the holistic discourse of non-medically qualified acupuncturists and homeopaths in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Givati Assaf

机构信息

University of Portsmouth, UK

出版信息

Health (London). 2015 Jan;19(1):34-50. doi: 10.1177/1363459314530739. Epub 2014 May 11.

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine practitioners have often utilised 'holism' as a key identification mark of their practice, distancing themselves from 'the reductionist biomedicine'. However, the past couple of decades have witnessed increased engagement of several complementary and alternative medicines in professionalisation, which includes a degree of biomedical alignment while 'reducing' holistic claims in order to provide practice with a 'credible outlook' and move closer to the mainstream, a development which challenges the role of holism in complementary and alternative medicine practices. This article explores the strategies by which two groups of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners, namely, non-medically qualified acupuncturists and homeopaths in the United Kingdom, pragmatically accommodate holistic notions as a professional resource, a process of negotiation between maintaining their holistic premise, on the one hand, and the drive to professionalise and enhance their societal status, on the other. Based on in-depth interviews with non-medically qualified acupuncture and homeopathy practitioners and school principals, textual analysis of practitioners' web sites and observation of practice, the findings demonstrate the dynamic approach to 'holism' in complementary and alternative medicine practice. This discourse, through which practitioners use a range of strategies in order to 'narrow' or 'expand' their holistic expression, can be described as 'pragmatic holism', by which they try to make gains from the formalisation/standardisation processes, without losing the therapies' holistic outlook and appeal.

摘要

补充和替代医学从业者常常将“整体论”作为其疗法的关键识别标志,以此与“还原论生物医学”区分开来。然而,在过去几十年里,几种补充和替代医学在专业化方面的参与度有所提高,这包括在“减少”整体论主张的同时进行一定程度的生物医学调整,以便为其疗法提供一种“可信的前景”并更接近主流医学,这一发展对整体论在补充和替代医学疗法中的作用构成了挑战。本文探讨了两组补充和替代医学从业者,即英国无医学资质的针灸师和顺势疗法从业者,如何将整体论概念作为一种专业资源进行务实整合的策略,这是一个在一方面维持其整体论前提,另一方面推动专业化并提升其社会地位之间进行协商的过程。基于对无医学资质的针灸和顺势疗法从业者以及学校校长的深入访谈、对从业者网站的文本分析以及对实际疗法的观察,研究结果展示了补充和替代医学疗法中对“整体论”的动态处理方式。这种从业者通过一系列策略来“缩小”或“扩大”其整体论表述的话语,可以被描述为“务实整体论”,通过这种方式,他们试图在形式化/标准化过程中获益,同时又不失去这些疗法的整体观和吸引力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验