Blum Alexander B, Egorova Natalia N, Sosunov Eugene A, Gelijns Annetine C, DuPree Erin, Moskowitz Alan J, Federman Alex D, Ascheim Deborah D, Keyhani Salomeh
From the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (A.B.B.); Departments of Health Evidence & Policy (A.B.B., N.N.E., A.C.G., E.D., A.J.M., D.D.A.) and Division of General Internal Medicine (A.D.F., A.J.M.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco and the San Francisco VA, San Francisco, CA (S.K.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May;7(3):391-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000520. Epub 2014 May 13.
Current 30-day readmission models used by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the purpose of hospital-level comparisons lack measures of socioeconomic status (SES). We examined whether the inclusion of an SES measure in 30-day congestive heart failure readmission models changed hospital risk-standardized readmission rates in New York City (NYC) hospitals.
Using a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-like model, we estimated 30-day hospital-level risk-standardized readmission rates by adjusting for age, sex, and comorbid conditions. Next, we examined how hospital risk-standardized readmission rates changed relative to the NYC mean with inclusion of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-validated SES index score. In a secondary analysis, we examined whether inclusion of the AHRQ SES index score in 30-day readmission models disproportionately impacted the risk-standardized readmission rates of minority-serving hospitals. Higher AHRQ SES scores, indicators of higher SES, were associated with lower odds (0.99) of 30-day readmission (P<0.019). The addition of the AHRQ SES index did not change the model's C statistic (0.63). After adjustment for the AHRQ SES index, 1 hospital changed status from worse than the NYC average to no different than the NYC average. After adjustment for the AHRQ SES index, 1 NYC minority-serving hospital was reclassified from worse to no different than average.
Although patients with higher SES were less likely to be admitted, the impact of SES on readmission was small. In NYC, inclusion of the AHRQ SES score in a CMS-based model did not impact hospital-level profiling based on 30-day readmission.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心目前用于医院层面比较的30天再入院模型缺乏社会经济地位(SES)衡量指标。我们研究了在30天充血性心力衰竭再入院模型中纳入SES衡量指标是否会改变纽约市(NYC)医院的风险标准化再入院率。
使用类似医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的模型,我们通过调整年龄、性别和合并症来估计30天医院层面的风险标准化再入院率。接下来,我们研究了随着纳入经医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)验证的SES指数得分,医院风险标准化再入院率相对于NYC均值如何变化。在一项次要分析中,我们研究了在30天再入院模型中纳入AHRQ SES指数得分是否会对为少数族裔服务的医院的风险标准化再入院率产生不成比例的影响。较高的AHRQ SES得分,即较高SES的指标,与30天再入院的较低几率(0.99)相关(P<0.019)。添加AHRQ SES指数并未改变模型的C统计量(0.63)。在调整AHRQ SES指数后,1家医院的状态从比NYC平均水平差变为与NYC平均水平无异。在调整AHRQ SES指数后,1家NYC为少数族裔服务的医院从比平均水平差重新分类为与平均水平无异。
尽管SES较高的患者再入院的可能性较小,但SES对再入院的影响较小。在NYC,在基于CMS的模型中纳入AHRQ SES得分并未影响基于30天再入院的医院层面分析。