Osti Mattia F, Agolli Linda, Bracci Stefano, Masoni Luigi, Valeriani Maurizio, Falco Teresa, De Sanctis Vitaliana, Maurizi Enrici Riccardo
Institute of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital Sapienza Rome University, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, Rome, 00189, Italy.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;29(7):835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1879-x. Epub 2014 May 14.
The primary end-points were complete pathological response and local control. Secondary end-points were survivals, anal sphincter preservation, and toxicity profile.
Patients with T3/T4 and or N+ rectal cancer (n = 65) were treated with preoperative concomitant boost radiotherapy (55 Gy/25 fractions) associated to concurrent chemotherapy with oral capecitabine.
All patients completed the programmed treatment. The complete pathological response was achieved by 17 % of the patients. Anal sphincter preservation surgery was possible for 86 % of the patients with low rectal cancer (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge). The T-stage and N-stage downstaging were achieved by 40 and 58 % of the patients, respectively. Circumferential radial margin was involved (close/positive) in eight patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, local and distant recurrence occurred in two and 11 patients, respectively. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 86.8 and 81 %, respectively. Non-hematological ≥ grade 3 toxicities were observed in 15 % of the patients. On univariate analysis N-downstaging and positive circumferential radial margin were significantly associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.003 and p = 0.023, respectively), disease-free survival (p = 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.038, respectively).On multivariate analysis, the N-downstaging were significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) (p = 0.022).
Our data support the efficacy of preoperative treatment for rectal cancer in terms of local outcomes. Radiation treatment intensification may have a biological rationale; longer follow-up is needed.
主要终点为完全病理缓解和局部控制。次要终点为生存率、肛门括约肌保留情况及毒性反应。
6:T3/T4和/或N+期直肠癌患者(n = 65)接受术前同步增量放疗(55 Gy/25次分割),并同时口服卡培他滨进行化疗。
所有患者均完成了既定治疗。17%的患者实现了完全病理缓解。86%的低位直肠癌(距肛缘≤5 cm)患者可行肛门括约肌保留手术。分别有40%和58%的患者实现了T分期和N分期降期。8例患者的环周切缘受累(切缘接近/阳性)。中位随访26个月后,分别有2例和11例患者出现局部和远处复发。3年总生存率和无病生存率分别为86.8%和81%。15%的患者出现了非血液学≥3级毒性反应。单因素分析显示,N分期降期和环周切缘阳性分别与较差的总生存率(p = 0.003和p = 0.023)、无病生存率(p = 0.001和p = 0.036)及无转移生存率(MFS)(p = 0.001和p = 0.038)显著相关。多因素分析显示,N分期降期与较好的总生存率(OS)显著相关(p = 0.022)。
我们的数据支持术前治疗对直肠癌局部疗效的有效性。放疗强化可能有生物学依据;需要更长时间的随访。