Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;19(9):2822-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2209-y. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
Complete pathologic response (CPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (combined modality treatment, CMT) for rectal cancer seems associated with improved survival compared to partial or no response (NPR). However, previous reports have been limited by small sample size and single-institution design.
A systematic literature review was conducted to detect studies comparing long-term results of patients with CPR and NPR after CMT for rectal cancer. Variables were pooled only if evaluated by 3 or more studies. Study end points included rates of CPR, local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), 5-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).
Twelve studies (1,913 patients) with rectal cancer treated with CMT were included. CPR was observed in 300 patients (15.6%). CPR and NPR patient groups were similar with respect to age, sex, tumor size, distance of tumor from the anus, and stage of disease before treatment. Median follow-up ranged from 23 to 46 months. CPR patients had lower rates of LR [0.7% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.90, P = 0.03], DR (5.3% vs. 24.1%; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.0001), and simultaneous LR + DR (0.7% vs. 4.8%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.01). OS was 92.9% for CPR versus 73.4% for NPR (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.84-7.22, P = 0.002), and DFS was 86.9% versus 63.9% (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.62-7.72, P = 0.002).
CPR after CMT for rectal cancer is associated with improved local and distal control as well as better OS and DFS.
新辅助放化疗(联合治疗模式,CMT)后直肠腺癌完全病理缓解(CPR)似乎与部分缓解或无缓解(NPR)相比,生存获益改善相关。然而,先前的报告受到样本量小和单中心设计的限制。
进行系统文献回顾,以检测比较 CMT 后 CPR 和 NPR 患者长期结果的研究。仅当评估了 3 项或更多研究时,才汇总变量。研究终点包括 CPR 率、局部复发(LR)率、远处复发(DR)率、5 年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
纳入了 12 项 CMT 治疗直肠癌的研究(共 1913 例患者)。300 例患者(15.6%)观察到 CPR。CPR 和 NPR 患者组在年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、肿瘤距肛门的距离以及治疗前疾病分期方面相似。中位随访时间为 23-46 个月。CPR 患者的 LR 发生率较低[0.7% vs. 2.6%;比值比(OR)0.45,95%置信区间(CI)0.22-0.90,P = 0.03]、DR 发生率较低[5.3% vs. 24.1%;OR 0.15,95%CI 0.07-0.31,P = 0.0001]、LR + DR 同时发生率较低[0.7% vs. 4.8%;OR 0.32,95%CI 0.13-0.79,P = 0.01]。CPR 患者的 OS 为 92.9%,而 NPR 患者为 73.4%(OR 3.6,95%CI 1.84-7.22,P = 0.002),DFS 为 86.9%对 63.9%(OR 3.53,95%CI 1.62-7.72,P = 0.002)。
CMT 后直肠腺癌的 CPR 与改善局部和远处控制以及更好的 OS 和 DFS 相关。