• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

截骨术与单髁人工关节置换术治疗膝关节单髁关节炎的对比

Osteotomy versus unicompartmental prosthetic replacement in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee.

作者信息

Karpman R R, Volz R G

出版信息

Orthopedics. 1982 Aug;5(8):989-91. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19820801-05.

DOI:10.3928/0147-7447-19820801-05
PMID:24831075
Abstract

Forty patients (44 knees) with unicompartmental arthritis of the knee were reviewed to assess the overall functional result following high tibial osteotomy as compared to unicompartmental prosthetic replacement. All patients were evaluated both pre- and postoperatively using a standardized computer form. Mean followup was 24 months in the osteotomy group, and 41 months in the prosthetic replacement group.Results in the osteotomy group were rated excellent in two patients, good in nine, and poor in 12. Results in the prosthetic replacement group were rated excellent in 10, good in nine and poor in two. We therefore believe that unicompartmental replacement offers a viable alternative to high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee if proper patient selection and precise component placement is employed.

摘要

对40例(44膝)膝关节单髁关节炎患者进行了回顾性研究,以评估高位胫骨截骨术与单髁假体置换术后的总体功能结果。所有患者在术前和术后均使用标准化计算机表格进行评估。截骨术组的平均随访时间为24个月,假体置换组为41个月。截骨术组中,2例结果评定为优,9例为良,12例为差。假体置换组中,10例结果评定为优,9例为良,2例为差。因此,我们认为,如果进行适当的患者选择并精确放置假体组件,单髁置换术在治疗膝关节单髁关节炎方面为高位胫骨截骨术提供了一种可行的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Osteotomy versus unicompartmental prosthetic replacement in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee.截骨术与单髁人工关节置换术治疗膝关节单髁关节炎的对比
Orthopedics. 1982 Aug;5(8):989-91. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19820801-05.
2
[Knee osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee replacement in the treatment of unicompartmental knee arthritis].膝关节截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗单髁膝关节关节炎的对比
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2006 Jul-Sep;110(3):582-9.
3
Surgical treatment of unicompartmental degenerative arthritis of the knee.膝关节单髁退行性关节炎的外科治疗
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1988 Dec;14(3):545-64.
4
Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy.单髁膝关节置换术或高位胫骨截骨术失败后的全膝关节翻修术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec(321):10-8.
5
Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period.膝关节骨关节炎的单髁关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术:一项随访12至17年的对比研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 May(302):134-7.
6
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results.单髁膝关节置换术:长期结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov(392):272-8.
7
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: survival longer than the patient.八旬老人的单髁膝关节置换术:假体生存率超过患者预期寿命。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Oct;451:107-12. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223983.67325.61.
8
The current status of computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement, and revision total knee replacement.计算机辅助高位胫骨截骨术、单髁膝关节置换术及全膝关节翻修置换术的现状
Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:721-6.
9
[Meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis].单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗单髁膝关节骨关节炎的Meta分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Oct 27;89(39):2768-72.
10
Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies.膝关节单髁骨关节炎的不同手术选择:高位胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:适应证、技术、结果及争议
Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:265-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术相比,疼痛程度较低,但活动范围较小:荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Sep 24;17(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03319-7.
2
High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗单髁膝关节骨关节炎的系统评价和Meta分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Mar 21;56(6):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00620-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Better clinical outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty when comparing with high tibial osteotomy.
与高位胫骨截骨术相比,单髁膝关节置换术后临床效果更佳。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009268.
4
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review.单髁膝关节置换术在治疗单髁骨关节炎方面是否优于高位胫骨截骨术?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 28;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9.
5
Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis (UKOA): Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)?单髁膝关节骨关节炎(UKOA):单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)还是高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Oct;4(4):307-313.
6
High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.膝关节内侧间室关节炎的高位胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术:文献综述
Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:131-40.