Xu Lin, Wang Xiaodong, Zhang Qin, Yang Wen, Zhu Wenjun, Zhao Ke
Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):760-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.026. Epub 2014 May 13.
The flapless implant technique is a predictable procedure with several advantages and a high overall implant survival rate. Immediate loading and early loading have been widely used in dental implant therapies and provide improved esthetics, with enhanced function and comfort. However, the scientific support for immediate or early loading approaches for flapless-placed dental implants is unclear.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the immediate versus early loading of dental implants with flapless placement.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI database, VIP database, WANFANG Database, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal were searched (up to October 2012). The systematic review included clinical randomized controlled trials that compared immediate with early loading of flapless-placed dental implants to replace missing teeth in adult participants who were partially or completely edentulous. The selection of included studies, data extraction, and assessment of the quality of the studies and evidence were conducted independently by 2 reviewers.
Six articles that reported on 4 randomized controlled trials that involved 180 selected participants were included. The implant failure rate was from 0.0% to 3.3% in both immediate and early loading groups with flapless implantation. No statistically significant differences were found in implant failure rates, periimplant marginal bone-level changes, or complications between the 2 groups. More participants preferred immediate loading rather than waiting for nearly 2 months.
Within the limitation of needing additional high-quality evidence, immediate and early loading of dental implants after flapless placement both demonstrated an acceptable short- to medium-term survival rate. Immediate loading seems more acceptable because of the time benefit.
无瓣种植技术是一种可预测的手术,具有多种优势且总体种植成功率较高。即刻负重和早期负重已广泛应用于牙种植治疗中,可改善美观效果,增强功能并提高舒适度。然而,对于无瓣植入牙种植体的即刻或早期负重方法,其科学依据尚不清楚。
本系统评价的目的是评估无瓣植入牙种植体即刻负重与早期负重的有效性和安全性。
检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国知网数据库、维普数据库、万方数据库以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台搜索门户(截至2012年10月)。该系统评价纳入了临床随机对照试验,这些试验比较了无瓣植入牙种植体即刻负重与早期负重,以替代部分或完全无牙的成年参与者缺失的牙齿。两名评价者独立进行纳入研究的选择、数据提取以及研究质量和证据的评估。
纳入了6篇报道4项随机对照试验的文章,共涉及180名选定的参与者。无瓣植入的即刻负重组和早期负重组的种植体失败率均为0.0%至3.3%。两组之间在种植体失败率、种植体周围边缘骨水平变化或并发症方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。更多参与者更喜欢即刻负重,而不是等待近2个月。
在需要更多高质量证据的限制范围内,无瓣植入后牙种植体的即刻负重和早期负重均显示出可接受的短期至中期生存率。由于时间优势,即刻负重似乎更易被接受。