Galaal Khadra, Al Moundhri Mansour, Bryant Andrew, Lopes Alberto D, Lawrie Theresa A
Gynaecological Oncology, Princess Alexandra Wing, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK, TR1 3LJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 15;2014(5):CD010681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010681.pub2.
Approximately 13% of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer present with advanced stage disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV). The standard treatment of advanced endometrial cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery followed by radiation therapy, or chemotherapy, or both. There is currently little agreement about which adjuvant treatment is the safest and most effective.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy or chemoradiation, and to determine which chemotherapy agents are most effective in women presenting with advanced endometrial cancer (FIGO stage III/IV).
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group's Trial Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 10 2013), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 2013. Also we searched electronic clinical trial registries for ongoing trials.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy or chemoradiation in women with FIGO stage III and IV endometrial cancer.
Two review authors selected trials, extracted data, and assessed trials for risk of bias. Where necessary, we contacted trial investigators for relevant, unpublished data. We pooled data using the random-effects model in Review Manager (RevMan) software.
We included four multicentre RCTs involving 1269 women with primary FIGO stage III/IV endometrial cancer. We considered the trials to be at low to moderate risk of bias. All participants received primary cytoreductive surgery. Two trials, evaluating 620 women (83% stage III, 17% stage IV), compared adjuvant chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy; one trial evaluating 552 women (88% stage III, 12% stage IV) compared two chemotherapy regimens (cisplatin/doxorubicin/paclitaxel (CDP) versus cisplatin/doxorubicin (CD) treatment) in women who had all undergone adjuvant radiotherapy; and one trial contributed no data.Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with adjuvant radiotherapy (OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.99, I² = 22%; and PFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92, I² = 0%). Sensitivity analysis using adjusted and unadjusted OS data, gave similar results. In subgroup analyses, the effects on survival in favour of chemotherapy were not different for stage III and IV, or stage IIIA and IIIC (tests for subgroup differences were not significant and I² = 0%). This evidence was of moderate quality. Data from one trial showed that women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to experience haematological and neurological adverse events and alopecia, and more likely to discontinue treatment (33/194 versus 6/202; RR 5.73, 95% CI 2.45 to 13.36), than those receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment-related deaths between the chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment arms (8/309 versus 5/311; Risk Ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 5.00).There was no clear difference in PFS between intervention groups in the one trial that compared CDP versus CD (552 women; HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.17). We considered this evidence to be of moderate quality. Mature OS data from this trial were not yet available. Severe haematological and neurological adverse events occurred more frequently with CDP than CD.We found no trials to include of adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiation in advanced endometrial cancer; however we identified one ongoing trial of this comparison.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate quality evidence that chemotherapy increases survival time after primary surgery by approximately 25% relative to radiotherapy in stage III and IV endometrial cancer. There is limited evidence that it is associated with more adverse effects. There is some uncertainty as to whether triplet regimens offer similar survival benefits over doublet regimens in the long-term. Further research is needed to determine which chemotherapy regimen(s) are the most effective and least toxic, and whether the addition of radiotherapy further improves outcomes. A large trial evaluating the benefits and risks of adjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer is ongoing.
在确诊为子宫内膜癌的女性中,约13%为晚期疾病(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)III/IV期)。晚期子宫内膜癌的标准治疗包括肿瘤细胞减灭术,随后进行放射治疗、化疗或两者联合。目前对于哪种辅助治疗最安全、最有效几乎没有共识。
评估辅助化疗与放疗或放化疗相比的有效性和安全性,并确定哪种化疗药物对晚期子宫内膜癌(FIGO III/IV期)女性最有效。
我们检索了Cochrane妇科癌症协作组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(2013年第10期)、截至2013年11月的MEDLINE和EMBASE。我们还检索了电子临床试验注册库以查找正在进行的试验。
在FIGO III期和IV期子宫内膜癌女性中,比较辅助化疗与放疗或放化疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位综述作者选择试验、提取数据并评估试验的偏倚风险。必要时,我们联系试验研究者获取相关未发表数据。我们使用Review Manager(RevMan)软件中的随机效应模型汇总数据。
我们纳入了四项多中心RCT,涉及1269例原发性FIGO III/IV期子宫内膜癌女性。我们认为这些试验的偏倚风险为低到中度。所有参与者均接受了原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术。两项试验评估了620例女性(83%为III期,17%为IV期),比较了辅助化疗与辅助放疗;一项试验评估了552例女性(88%为III期,12%为IV期),比较了在均接受辅助放疗的女性中两种化疗方案(顺铂/多柔比星/紫杉醇(CDP)与顺铂/多柔比星(CD)治疗);还有一项试验未提供数据。与辅助放疗相比,辅助化疗的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)更长(OS:风险比(HR)0.75,95%置信区间(CI)0.57至0.99,I² = 22%;PFS:HR 0.74,95% CI 0.59至0.92,I² = 0%)。使用调整和未调整的OS数据进行的敏感性分析得出了类似结果。在亚组分析中,化疗对III期和IV期或IIIA期和IIIC期生存的有利影响没有差异(亚组差异检验无显著性,I² = 0%)。该证据质量为中等。一项试验的数据显示,与接受辅助放疗的女性相比,接受辅助化疗的女性更有可能出现血液学和神经学不良事件以及脱发,且更有可能停止治疗(33/194对6/202;RR 5.73,95% CI 2.45至13.36)。化疗和放疗治疗组之间与治疗相关的死亡没有统计学显著差异(8/309对5/311;风险比(RR)1.67,95% CI 0.55至5.00)。在比较CDP与CD的一项试验中,干预组之间的PFS没有明显差异(552例女性;HR 0.90,95% CI 0.69至1.17)。我们认为该证据质量为中等。该试验的成熟OS数据尚未可得。CDP组严重血液学和神经学不良事件的发生频率高于CD组。我们未找到关于晚期子宫内膜癌辅助化疗与放化疗比较的试验;然而,我们确定了一项正在进行的该比较试验。
有中等质量证据表明,在III期和IV期子宫内膜癌中,相对于放疗,化疗可使初次手术后的生存时间增加约25%。有限的证据表明其与更多不良事件相关。关于三联方案长期来看是否比双联方案提供相似的生存益处存在一些不确定性。需要进一步研究以确定哪种化疗方案最有效且毒性最小,以及放疗的加入是否能进一步改善结局。一项评估晚期子宫内膜癌辅助放化疗与化疗的益处和风险的大型试验正在进行。