Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield Sheffield, S10 2TN, U.K ; Escuela de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma 'Benito Juárez' de Oaxaca Oaxaca, 68120, Mexico.
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, U.K.
Ecol Evol. 2014 Apr;4(8):1413-22. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1017. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Understanding the long-term dynamics of urban vegetation is essential in determining trends in the provision of key resources for biodiversity and ecosystem services and improving their management. Such studies are, however, extremely scarce due to the lack of suitable historical data. We use repeat historical photographs from the 1900s, 1950s, and 2010 to assess general trends in the quantity and size distributions of the tree stock in urban Sheffield and resultant aboveground carbon storage. Total tree numbers declined by a third from the 1900s to the 1950s, but increased by approximately 50% from the 1900s-2010, and by 100% from the 1950s-2010. Aboveground carbon storage in urban tree stocks had doubled by 2010 from the levels present in the 1900s and 1950s. The initial decrease occurred at a time when national and regional tree stocks were static and are likely to be driven by rebuilding following bombing of the urban area during the Second World War and by urban expansion. In 2010, trees greater than 10 m in height comprised just 8% of those present. The increases in total tree numbers are thus largely driven by smaller trees and are likely to be associated with urban tree planting programmes. Changes in tree stocks were not constant across the urban area but varied with the current intensity of urbanization. Increases from 1900 to 2010 in total tree stocks, and smaller sized trees, tended to be greatest in the most intensely urbanized areas. In contrast, the increases in the largest trees were more marked in areas with the most green space. These findings emphasize the importance of preserving larger fragments of urban green space to protect the oldest and largest trees that contribute disproportionately to carbon storage and other ecosystem services. Maintaining positive trends in urban tree stocks and associated ecosystem service provision will require continued investment in urban tree planting programmes in combination with additional measures, such as revisions to tree preservation orders, to increase the retention of such trees as they mature.
了解城市植被的长期动态对于确定生物多样性和生态系统服务关键资源的提供趋势以及改善其管理至关重要。然而,由于缺乏合适的历史数据,此类研究极为罕见。我们使用 20 世纪 1900 年代、1950 年代和 2010 年的重复历史照片来评估谢菲尔德市树木存量的数量和大小分布的总体趋势及其产生的地上碳储存。从 1900 年代到 1950 年代,树木总数减少了三分之一,但从 1900 年代到 2010 年代增加了约 50%,从 1950 年代到 2010 年代增加了 100%。到 2010 年,城市树木存量中的地上碳储存是 1900 年代和 1950 年代的两倍。最初的下降发生在国家和地区树木存量保持静止的时期,很可能是由于第二次世界大战期间城市地区遭受轰炸后的重建以及城市扩张所导致的。到 2010 年,高度超过 10 米的树木仅占现有树木的 8%。因此,树木总数的增加主要是由较小的树木驱动的,这很可能与城市植树计划有关。树木存量的变化在整个城市区域并不稳定,而是随着城市化的当前强度而变化。从 1900 年到 2010 年,树木存量和较小树木的增加在城市化程度最高的地区最大。相比之下,在绿地最多的地区,最大树木的增加更为明显。这些发现强调了保护城市绿地较大片段的重要性,以保护对碳储存和其他生态系统服务贡献不成比例的最古老和最大的树木。要保持城市树木存量和相关生态系统服务提供的积极趋势,需要继续投资于城市植树计划,并采取额外措施,例如修订树木保护令,以增加这些树木成熟时的保留率。