Chan Joel, Schunn Christian
Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;39(1):126-55. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12127. Epub 2014 May 16.
Research on innovation often highlights analogies from sources outside the current problem domain as a major source of novel concepts; however, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well understood. We analyzed the temporal interplay between far analogy use and creative concept generation in a professional design team's brainstorming conversations, investigating the hypothesis that far analogies lead directly to very novel concepts via large steps in conceptual spaces (jumps). Surprisingly, we found that concepts were more similar to their preceding concepts after far analogy use compared to baseline situations (i.e., without far analogy use). Yet far analogies increased the team's concept generation rate compared to baseline conditions. Overall, these results challenge the view that far analogies primarily lead to novel concepts via jumps in conceptual spaces and suggest alternative pathways from far analogies to novel concepts (e.g., iterative, deep exploration within a functional space).
关于创新的研究常常强调来自当前问题领域之外的类比是新颖概念的主要来源;然而,这种关系背后的机制尚未得到充分理解。我们分析了一个专业设计团队头脑风暴对话中远距离类比使用与创造性概念生成之间的时间相互作用,研究远距离类比通过概念空间中的大步跳跃(跃迁)直接导致非常新颖概念的假设。令人惊讶的是,我们发现与基线情况(即不使用远距离类比)相比,在使用远距离类比后概念与其先前概念更为相似。然而,与基线条件相比,远距离类比提高了团队的概念生成率。总体而言,这些结果挑战了远距离类比主要通过概念空间中的跃迁导致新颖概念的观点,并提出了从远距离类比到新颖概念的替代途径(例如,在功能空间内进行迭代、深入探索)。