Hetherington Chelsea, Hendrickson Caroline, Koenig Melissa
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Dev Sci. 2014 Nov;17(6):1042-9. doi: 10.1111/desc.12192. Epub 2014 May 19.
How impressionable are in-group biases in early childhood? Previous research shows that young children display robust preferences for members of their own social group, but also condemn those who harm others. The current study investigates children's evaluations of agents when their group membership and moral behavior conflict. After being assigned to a minimal group, 4- to 5-year-old children either saw their in-group member behave antisocially, an out-group member act prosocially, or control agents, for whom moral information was removed. Children's explicit preference for and willingness to share with their in-group member was significantly attenuated in the presence of an antisocial in-group member, but not a prosocial out-group member. Interestingly, children's learning decisions were unmoved by a person's moral behavior, instead being consistently guided by group membership. This demonstrates that children's in-group bias is remarkably flexible: while moral information curbs children's in-group bias on social evaluations, social learning is still driven by group information.
幼儿时期的内群体偏见有多容易受到影响?先前的研究表明,幼儿对自己社会群体的成员表现出强烈的偏好,但也会谴责那些伤害他人的人。当前的研究调查了在群体成员身份和道德行为发生冲突时儿童对行为主体的评价。在被分配到一个最小群体后,4至5岁的儿童要么看到他们的内群体成员表现出反社会行为,要么看到外群体成员表现出亲社会行为,要么看到道德信息被去除的控制组行为主体。在有反社会的内群体成员存在的情况下,儿童对自己内群体成员的明确偏好和与之分享的意愿显著减弱,但在有亲社会的外群体成员存在时则没有。有趣的是,儿童的学习决策不受一个人的道德行为影响,而是始终受群体成员身份的引导。这表明儿童的内群体偏见非常灵活:虽然道德信息在社会评价中抑制了儿童的内群体偏见,但社会学习仍然由群体信息驱动。