Birnbach David J, Rosen Lisa F, Fitzpatrick Maureen, Carling Philip, Arheart Kristopher L, Munoz-Price L Silvia
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, UM-JMH Center for Patient Safety, and the †Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and ‡Department of Medicine Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):848-52. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000230.
Oral flora, blood-borne pathogens, and bacterial contamination pose a direct risk of infection to patients and health care workers. We conducted a study in a simulated operating room using a newly validated technology to determine whether the use of 2 sets of gloves, with the outer set removed immediately after endotracheal intubation, may reduce this risk.
Forty-one anesthesiology residents (PGY 2-4) were enrolled in a study consisting of individual or group simulation sessions. On entry to the simulated operating room, the residents were asked to perform an anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation timed to approximately 6 minutes; they were unaware of the study design. Of the 22 simulation sessions, 11 were conducted with the intubating resident wearing single gloves, and 11 with the intubating resident using double gloves with the outer pair removed after verified intubation. Before the start of the scenario, we coated the lips and inside of the mouth of the mannequin with a fluorescent marking gel as a surrogate pathogen. After the simulation, an observer examined 40 different sites using a handheld ultraviolet light in the operating room to determine the transfer of surrogate pathogens to the patient and the patient's environment. Residents who wore double gloves were instructed by a confederate nurse to remove the outer set immediately after completion of the intubation. Forty sites of potential intraoperative pathogen spread were identified and assigned a score.
The difference in the rate of contamination between anesthesiology residents who wore single gloves versus those with double gloves was clinically and statistically significant. The number of sites that were contaminated in the operating room when the intubating resident wore single gloves was 20.3 ± 1.4 (mean ± SE); the number of contaminated sites when residents wore double gloves was 5.0 ± 0.7 (P < 0.001).
The results of this study suggest that when an anesthesiologist wears 2 sets of gloves during laryngoscopy and intubation and then removes the outer set immediately after intubation, the contamination of the intraoperative environment is dramatically reduced.
口腔菌群、血源性病原体及细菌污染对患者和医护人员构成直接感染风险。我们在模拟手术室中使用一项新验证的技术开展了一项研究,以确定使用两组手套并在气管插管后立即摘除外层手套是否可降低此风险。
41名麻醉科住院医师(住院医师第2至4年)参与了一项包含个人或小组模拟环节的研究。进入模拟手术室后,要求住院医师进行麻醉诱导和气管插管,时间约为6分钟;他们并不知晓研究设计。在22次模拟环节中,11次是插管住院医师戴单层手套进行操作,11次是插管住院医师使用双层手套并在确认插管后摘除外层手套。在模拟场景开始前,我们在人体模型的嘴唇和口腔内部涂抹了一种荧光标记凝胶作为替代病原体。模拟结束后,一名观察者在手术室使用手持紫外线灯检查40个不同部位,以确定替代病原体向患者及其周围环境的传播情况。戴双层手套的住院医师由一名协同护士指导在插管完成后立即摘除外层手套。确定了40个术中潜在病原体传播部位并进行评分。
戴单层手套的麻醉科住院医师与戴双层手套的住院医师之间的污染率差异在临床和统计学上均具有显著意义。插管住院医师戴单层手套时手术室中被污染的部位数量为20.3±1.4(均值±标准误);住院医师戴双层手套时被污染的部位数量为5.0±0.7(P<0.001)。
本研究结果表明,麻醉医师在喉镜检查和插管过程中戴两组手套并在插管后立即摘除外层手套时,术中环境的污染会显著降低。