Hall Jori, Freeman Melissa, Roulston Kathy
University of Georgia, United States.
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Aug;45:151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
Since many educational researchers and program developers have limited knowledge of formative evaluation, formative data may be underutilized during the development and implementation of an educational program. The purpose of this article is to explain how participatory, responsive, educative, and qualitative approaches to formative evaluation can facilitate a partnership between evaluators and educational researchers and program managers to generate data useful to inform program implementation and improvement. This partnership is critical, we argue, because it enables an awareness of when to take appropriate action to ensure successful educational programs or "kairos". To illustrate, we use examples from our own evaluation work to highlight how formative evaluation may facilitate opportune moments to (1) define the substance and purpose of a program, (2) develop understanding and awareness of the cultural interpretations of program participants, and (3) show the relevance of stakeholder experiences to program goals.
由于许多教育研究人员和项目开发者对形成性评价的了解有限,在教育项目的开发和实施过程中,形成性数据可能未得到充分利用。本文旨在解释形成性评价的参与式、响应式、教育性和定性方法如何促进评价者与教育研究人员及项目管理者之间的合作,以生成有助于指导项目实施和改进的数据。我们认为,这种合作至关重要,因为它能让人意识到何时采取适当行动以确保教育项目的成功或“恰当时机”。为了说明这一点,我们将以我们自己的评价工作为例,强调形成性评价如何促进适时的时机,以便(1)界定项目的实质和目的,(2)增进对项目参与者文化解读的理解和认识,以及(3)展示利益相关者的经验与项目目标的相关性。