Suppr超能文献

沼气发电的生产成本和运营利润。意大利的全面案例研究。

Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.

机构信息

Gruppo Ricicla, DiSAA, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Gruppo Ricicla, DiSAA, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; Gruppo Ricicla, DiSAA, Biomass and Bioenergy Lab., Parco Tecnologico Padano, Via Einstein, Località Cascina Codazza, 26900 Lodi, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2014 Aug;34(8):1429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 May 16.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to observe the economic sustainability of three different biogas full scale plants, fed with different organic matrices: energy crops (EC), manure, agro-industrial (Plants B and C) and organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) (Plant A). The plants were observed for one year and total annual biomass feeding, biomass composition and biomass cost (€ Mg(-1)), initial investment cost and plant electric power production were registered. The unit costs of biogas and electric energy (€ Sm(-3)biogas, € kWh(-1)EE) were differently distributed, depending on the type of feed and plant. Plant A showed high management/maintenance cost for OFMSW treatment (0.155 € Sm(-3)biogas, 45% of total cost), Plant B suffered high cost for EC supply (0.130 € Sm(-3)biogas, 49% of total cost) and Plant C showed higher impact on the total costs because of the depreciation charge (0.146 € Sm(-3)biogas, 41% of total costs). The breakeven point for the tariff of electric energy, calculated for the different cases, resulted in the range 120-170 € MWh(-1)EE, depending on fed materials and plant scale. EC had great impact on biomass supply costs and should be reduced, in favor of organic waste and residues; plant scale still heavily influences the production costs. The EU States should drive incentives in dependence of these factors, to further develop this still promising sector.

摘要

本研究旨在观察三种不同规模的沼气厂的经济可持续性,这些沼气厂使用不同的有机基质:能源作物(EC)、粪便、农业工业(植物 B 和 C)和城市固体废物的有机部分(OFMSW)(植物 A)。这些工厂被观察了一年,记录了总年度生物质进料量、生物质组成和生物质成本(€ Mg(-1))、初始投资成本和工厂电力生产。沼气和电能的单位成本(€ Sm(-3)biogas,€ kWh(-1)EE)因饲料和工厂的类型而异。植物 A 对 OFMSW 处理的管理/维护成本较高(0.155 € Sm(-3)biogas,占总成本的 45%),植物 B 对 EC 供应的成本较高(0.130 € Sm(-3)biogas,占总成本的 49%),植物 C 由于折旧费用对总成本的影响更大(0.146 € Sm(-3)biogas,占总成本的 41%)。根据不同情况计算的电价盈亏平衡点为 120-170€MWh(-1)EE,具体取决于饲料和工厂规模。EC 对生物质供应成本有重大影响,应减少其使用,转而使用有机废物和残渣;工厂规模仍严重影响生产成本。欧盟各国应根据这些因素制定激励措施,以进一步发展这一仍有前途的部门。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验