Suppr超能文献

开放式口含管通气:简明临床综述。

Open circuit mouthpiece ventilation: Concise clinical review.

作者信息

Garuti G, Nicolini A, Grecchi B, Lusuardi M, Winck J C, Bach J R

机构信息

Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit, San Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Respiratory Medicine Unit, General Hospital of Sestri Levante, Italy.

出版信息

Rev Port Pneumol. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 May 17.

Abstract

In 2013 new "mouthpiece ventilation" modes are being introduced to commercially available portable ventilators. Despite this, there is little knowledge of how to use noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIV) as opposed to bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP) and both have almost exclusively been reported to have been used via nasal or oro-nasal interfaces rather than via a simple mouthpiece. Non-invasive ventilation is often reported as failing because of airway secretion encumbrance, because of hypercapnia due to inadequate bi-level PAP settings, or poor interface tolerance. The latter can be caused by factors such as excessive pressure on the face from poor fit, excessive oral air leak, anxiety, claustrophobia, and patient-ventilator dys-synchrony. Thus, the interface plays a crucial role in tolerance and effectiveness. Interfaces that cover the nose and/or nose and mouth (oro-nasal) are the most commonly used but are more likely to cause skin breakdown and claustrophobia. Most associated drawbacks can be avoided by using mouthpiece NIV. Open-circuit mouthpiece NIV is being used by large populations in some centers for daytime ventilatory support and complements nocturnal NIV via "mask" interfaces for nocturnal ventilatory support. Mouthpiece NIV is also being used for sleep with the mouthpiece fixed in place by a lip-covering flange. Small 15 and 22mm angled mouthpieces and straw-type mouthpieces are the most commonly used. NIV via mouthpiece is being used as an effective alternative to ventilatory support via tracheostomy tube (TMV) and is associated with a reduced risk of pneumonias and other respiratory complications. Its use facilitates "air-stacking" to improve cough, speech, and pulmonary compliance, all of which better maintain quality of life for patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) than the invasive alternatives. Considering these benefits and the new availability of mouthpiece ventilator modes, wider knowledge of this technique is now warranted. This review highlights the indications, techniques, advantages and disadvantages of mouthpiece NIV.

摘要

2013年,新型“口含器通气”模式被引入市售便携式呼吸机。尽管如此,对于如何使用无创间歇性正压通气(NIV)而非双水平气道正压通气(PAP),人们了解甚少,而且几乎所有报道都表明,这两种通气方式几乎都是通过鼻或口鼻界面而非简单的口含器使用。无创通气常常被报道失败,原因包括气道分泌物阻塞、双水平PAP设置不足导致的高碳酸血症,或界面耐受性差。后者可能由多种因素引起,如面罩佩戴不当导致面部压力过大、口腔漏气过多、焦虑、幽闭恐惧症以及患者与呼吸机不同步。因此,界面在耐受性和有效性方面起着至关重要的作用。覆盖鼻子和/或鼻子及嘴巴(口鼻)的界面是最常用的,但更有可能导致皮肤破损和幽闭恐惧症。使用口含器NIV可避免大多数相关缺点。在一些中心,大量人群在白天使用开路口含器NIV进行通气支持,并通过“面罩”界面补充夜间NIV以进行夜间通气支持。口含器NIV也用于睡眠,口含器通过覆盖嘴唇的凸缘固定在位。15毫米和22毫米的小型弯头口含器和吸管型口含器是最常用的。通过口含器进行的NIV正被用作气管造口管通气支持(TMV)的有效替代方法,并且与肺炎和其他呼吸并发症的风险降低相关。它的使用有助于“气体堆叠”以改善咳嗽、言语和肺顺应性,与侵入性替代方法相比,所有这些都能更好地维持神经肌肉疾病(NMD)患者的生活质量。考虑到这些益处以及口含器通气模式的新可用性,现在有必要更广泛地了解这项技术。本综述重点介绍了口含器NIV的适应症、技术、优点和缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验