Division of General and Community Paediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2011, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA,
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Nov;3(5):391-8. doi: 10.1007/s40037-014-0117-0.
To determine if implementing an educationally minded schedule utilizing consecutive night shifts can moderate the impact of the 2011 duty hour standards on education and patient continuity of care in longitudinal primary care experience (continuity clinic). A 14-month pre-post study was performed in continuity clinic with one supervising physician group and two intern groups. Surveys to assess attitudes and education were distributed to the supervising physicians and interns before and after the changes in duty hour standards. Intern groups' schedules were reviewed for the number of regular and alternative day clinic (i.e. primary care experience on a different weekday) sessions and patient continuity of care. Fifteen supervising physicians and 51 interns participated (25 in 2011, 26 in 2012). Intern groups' comfort when discussing patient issues, educational needs and teamwork perception did not differ. Supervising physicians' understanding of learning needs and provision of feedback did not differ between groups. Supervising physicians indicated a greater ability to provide feedback and understand learning needs during regular continuity clinic sessions compared with alternative day clinics (all p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected between intern groups in the number of regularly scheduled continuity clinics, alternative day clinics or patient continuity of care. The 2011 duty hour standards required significant alterations to intern schedules, but educationally minded scheduling limited impact on education and patient continuity in care.
为了确定在利用连续夜班制定教育导向的时间表是否可以减轻 2011 年值班时间标准对纵向初级保健经验(连续性诊所)中的教育和患者护理连续性的影响,我们进行了一项为期 14 个月的前后研究,该研究在连续性诊所中进行,涉及一个监督医生组和两个实习医生组。在值班时间标准发生变化前后,向监督医生和实习医生分发了评估态度和教育的调查问卷。审查了实习医生组的日程安排,以了解常规和替代日诊所(即在不同的工作日进行初级保健体验)的次数和患者护理连续性。共有 15 名监督医生和 51 名实习医生参与了研究(2011 年 25 名,2012 年 26 名)。实习医生组在讨论患者问题、教育需求和团队合作感知方面的舒适度没有差异。监督医生对学习需求的理解和反馈的提供在两组之间没有差异。监督医生表示,与替代日诊所相比,在常规连续性诊所期间提供反馈和理解学习需求的能力更强(均 p<0.05)。常规连续性诊所、替代日诊所或患者护理连续性方面,实习医生组之间没有发现显著差异。2011 年的值班时间标准要求对实习医生的日程安排进行重大调整,但以教育为导向的安排对教育和患者护理连续性的影响有限。