Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, TX, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2014 Aug;45(8):1572-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) are two distinct intraductal lesions; the former is usually associated with invasive carcinoma and has an aggressive course while the latter is considered a precancerous lesion. In addition, there are morphologically lesions not well characterized that fall between IDC-P and HGPIN, consequently termed "atypical cribriform lesions (ACLs)." Using whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens, we evaluated the relationship between these intraductal proliferative lesions and clinicopathological parameters. In this study, ACLs were characterized as a loose cribriform intraductal proliferation with greater architectural complexity when compared to HGPIN, but lacking significant nuclear pleomorphism and/or comedonecrosis. Of 901 radical prostatectomies (2006-2012), IDC-P, ACL, and HGPIN were recorded in 155, 22, 436 cases, respectively. Patients with IDC-P showed more aggressive pathologic features when compared to HGPIN. Invasive cancers in patients with ACL had higher Gleason score (P=.00016), larger tumor volume (P=.025), and more advanced pT stage (P=.023) than those with HGPIN. Cases with ACL showed a higher risk of biochemical recurrence than those with HGPIN and a lower risk than those with IDC-P based on log-rank tests (P=.0045 and P=.0069, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the presence of HGPIN was identified as an independent predictor for infrequent biochemical recurrence (P=.0058). We confirmed IDC-P as a marker of adverse pathologic features and clinical aggressiveness. Our results suggest that ACL should be distinguished from HGPIN and these lesions mandate active clinical surveillance.
前列腺导管内癌(IDC-P)和高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)是两种不同的导管内病变;前者通常与浸润性癌相关,具有侵袭性病程,而后者被认为是癌前病变。此外,还有一些形态上不明确的病变介于 IDC-P 和 HGPIN 之间,因此被称为“非典型筛状病变(ACLs)”。我们使用全器官前列腺切除术标本评估了这些导管内增生性病变与临床病理参数之间的关系。在这项研究中,ACLs 的特征是松散的筛状导管内增生,与 HGPIN 相比具有更大的结构复杂性,但缺乏明显的核异型性和/或粉刺坏死。在 901 例根治性前列腺切除术(2006-2012 年)中,分别记录了 155 例 IDC-P、22 例 ACL 和 436 例 HGPIN。与 HGPIN 相比,IDC-P 患者表现出更具侵袭性的病理特征。在 ACL 患者中,侵袭性癌症的 Gleason 评分更高(P=.00016)、肿瘤体积更大(P=.025)、pT 分期更晚(P=.023)。基于对数秩检验,ACLs 病例的生化复发风险高于 HGPIN 病例,而低于 IDC-P 病例(P=.0045 和 P=.0069)。多变量分析显示,HGPIN 的存在是生化复发不频繁的独立预测因素(P=.0058)。我们证实 IDC-P 是不良病理特征和临床侵袭性的标志物。我们的结果表明,ACLs 应与 HGPIN 区分开来,这些病变需要积极的临床监测。