Cheng Gang, Cheng Wei, Jiang Yong-Gui
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014 Mar;34(3):230-4.
To observe the difference in the therapeutic effects on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) among auricular electroacupuncture therapy plus isolated moxibustion with Lingxian herbal paste (combined therapy), electroacupuncture (EA) and TDP irradiation.
Eighty-nine cases were randomized into three groups. In the combined therapy group (30 cases), the auricular electroacupuncture therapy was adopted together with the isolated moxibustion with Lingxian herbal paste. The auricular points were xi (AH4), pizhixia (AT4), shenmen (TF4), etc. The Lingxian herbal paste was applied at Yanglingquan (GB 34), Dubi (ST 35), Zusanli (ST 36), Neixiyan (EX-LE 4), Heding (EX-LE 2) and Ashi points. In EA group (29 cases), EA was applied at the acupoints that were same as those in the isolated moxibustion with Lingxian herbal paste. In TDP group (30 cases), TDP irradiation was given at the affected knee. The treatment was given once every day, 10 treatments made one session and there was 1 week at the interval among sessions. Totally, 3 sessions of treatment were required. KOA clinical symptom and physical sign score and the single item pain symptom score of Lequesne index were observed before treatment and 1 week after treatment in the patients of each group separately. The efficacies were compared among the three groups.
One week after treatment, the total score of symptoms and physical signs of the patients in each group was reduced significantly as compared with that before treatment (all P < 0.05). The improvements in the symptoms and physical signs in the combined therapy group were better than those in the other two groups (1.50 +/- 1.57 vs 2.52 +/- 1.82, 2.63 +/- 1.97, both P < 0.05). The improvement in pain in the combined therapy group was also better than that in the other two groups (2.37 +/- 0.81 vs 2.83 +/- 0.92, P < 0.05; 2.37 +/- 0.81 vs 3.03 +/- 0.77, P < 0.01). The curative rate in the combined therapy group was 40.0% (12/30), which was higher than 17.2% (5/29) in EA group and 20.0% (6/30) in TDP group separately (both P < 0.01). The overall efficacy in the combined therapy group was superior to the other two groups (P < 0.05).
The auricular electroacupuncture therapy plus isolated moxibustion with Lingxian herbal paste is advantageous at the total score of the symptoms and physical signs and the overall efficacy in the patients of KOA as compared with EA at the local acupoints and local TDP irradiation.
观察耳穴电针联合灵仙膏隔物灸(联合疗法)、电针(EA)及特定电磁波谱(TDP)照射治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的疗效差异。
将89例患者随机分为三组。联合治疗组(30例)采用耳穴电针联合灵仙膏隔物灸。耳穴取膝(AH4)、皮质下(AT4)、神门(TF4)等。灵仙膏敷于阳陵泉(GB 34)、犊鼻(ST 35)、足三里(ST 36)、内膝眼(EX-LE 4)、鹤顶(EX-LE 2)及阿是穴。电针组(29例),针刺穴位与灵仙膏隔物灸相同。TDP组(30例),对患侧膝关节进行TDP照射。每日治疗1次,10次为1个疗程,疗程间间隔1周。共需治疗3个疗程。分别观察每组患者治疗前及治疗后1周的KOA临床症状体征评分及Lequesne指数单项疼痛症状评分。比较三组疗效。
治疗1周后,各组患者症状体征总分较治疗前均显著降低(均P<0.05)。联合治疗组症状体征改善情况优于其他两组(1.50±1.57 vs 2.52±1.82,2.63±1.97,均P<0.05)。联合治疗组疼痛改善情况也优于其他两组(2.37±0.81 vs 2.83±0.92,P<0.05;2.37±0.81 vs 3.03±0.77,P<0.01)。联合治疗组治愈率为40.0%(12/30),分别高于电针组的17.2%(5/29)和TDP组的20.0%(6/30)(均P<0.01)。联合治疗组总有效率优于其他两组(P<0.05)。
与局部穴位电针及局部TDP照射相比,耳穴电针联合灵仙膏隔物灸在KOA患者症状体征总分及总有效率方面具有优势。