Xie Hong-Wu, Chen Ri-Xin, Xu Fang-Ming, Song Yun-E, Tang Xi, Li La-Mei
College of TCM, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012 Mar;32(3):229-32.
To verify the clinical efficacy of heat-sensitive moxibustion in treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Sixty cases of KOA were randomly divided into a heat-sensitive moxibustion group and a conventional moxibustion group, 30 cases in each one. Dubi (ST 35), Yanglingquan (GB 34), Zusanli (ST 36) and Heding (EX-LE 2) on the affected side were selected in two groups. In heat-sensitive moxibustion group, the techniques of circling moxibustion, sparrow-pecking moxibustion, moving moxibustion and mild moxibustion were applied. In conventional moxibustion group, the mild moxibustion was used, 2 to 3 cm far from the skin of the acupoints selected. Lysholm scale for the assessment of knee joint function was adopted to evaluate the efficacy. The scores of joint pain, morning stiffness, joint swelling and walking ability were compared before and after treatment in two groups.
The scores of joint pain, morning stiffness, joint swelling and walking ability after treatment were all apparently improved as compared with those before treatment in either group (all P < 0.05). The improvement in the above-mentioned indices in heat-sensitive moxibustion group was much more apparent as compared with that in conventional moxibustion group (all P < 0.01). The effective rate was 90.0% (27/30) in heat-sensitive moxibustion group and was 73.3% (22/30) in conventional moxibustion group. The effective rate in heat-sensitive moxibustion group was obviously superior to that in conventional moxibustion group (P < 0.01).
The efficacy of heat-sensitive moxibustion is superior to that of conventional moxibustion in the treatment of KOA. This therapy can more significantly improve the symptoms and physical signs of the patients with KOA.
验证热敏灸治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的临床疗效。
将60例KOA患者随机分为热敏灸组和传统灸组,每组30例。两组均选取患侧犊鼻(ST 35)、阳陵泉(GB 34)、足三里(ST 36)和鹤顶(EX-LE 2)。热敏灸组采用回旋灸、雀啄灸、循经往返灸和温和灸技术。传统灸组采用温和灸,距离所选穴位皮肤2至3厘米。采用Lysholm膝关节功能评分量表评估疗效。比较两组治疗前后关节疼痛、晨僵、关节肿胀及行走能力的评分。
两组治疗后关节疼痛、晨僵、关节肿胀及行走能力评分均较治疗前明显改善(均P<0.05)。热敏灸组上述指标的改善较传统灸组更为明显(均P<0.01)。热敏灸组有效率为90.0%(27/30),传统灸组为73.3%(22/30)。热敏灸组有效率明显优于传统灸组(P<0.01)。
热敏灸治疗KOA的疗效优于传统灸。该疗法能更显著改善KOA患者的症状和体征。