Hall Sue, Davies Joanna M, Gao Wei, Higginson Irene J
Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;28(9):1118-27. doi: 10.1177/0269216314533740. Epub 2014 May 20.
To provide effective palliative care in different settings, it is important to understand and identify the sources of dignity-related distress experienced by people nearing the end of life.
To describe and compare the sources of dignity-related distress reported by cancer patients and care home residents.
Secondary analysis of merged data. Participants completed the Patient Dignity Inventory (assessing 25 sources of dignity-related distress) and measures of quality of life and depression.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 45 adult patients with advanced cancer referred to hospital-based palliative care teams in London, United Kingdom, and 60 residents living in one of 15 care homes in London.
Care home residents were older and had poorer functioning. Both groups reported a wide range of dignity-related problems. Although the number or problems reported on the Patient Dignity Inventory was similar for the two groups (mean (standard deviation): 5.9 (5.5) for cancer patients and 4.1 (4.3) for care home residents, p = 0.07), there was a tendency for more cancer patients to report some existential problems. Experiencing physically distressing symptoms and functional limitations were prevalent problems for both groups. Patient Dignity Inventory problems were associated with poorer performance status and functioning for residents, with age and cognitive impairment for cancer patients and with poorer quality of life and depression for both groups.
Although characteristics of the samples differed, similarities in the dignity-related problems reported by cancer patients and care home residents support research suggesting a common pathway towards death for malignant and non-malignant disease. A wider understanding of the sources of dignity-related distress would help clinicians provide more effective end-of-life care.
为在不同环境中提供有效的姑息治疗,了解并识别临终患者尊严相关困扰的来源很重要。
描述并比较癌症患者和养老院居民报告的尊严相关困扰的来源。
对合并数据进行二次分析。参与者完成了患者尊严量表(评估25个尊严相关困扰的来源)以及生活质量和抑郁量表。
地点/参与者:英国伦敦共有45名转诊至医院姑息治疗团队的成年晚期癌症患者,以及伦敦15家养老院之一的60名居民。
养老院居民年龄更大且功能较差。两组都报告了广泛的尊严相关问题。尽管两组在患者尊严量表上报告的问题数量相似(平均值(标准差):癌症患者为5.9(5.5),养老院居民为4.1(4.3),p = 0.07),但更多癌症患者倾向于报告一些生存问题。经历身体痛苦症状和功能受限是两组普遍存在的问题。患者尊严量表问题与居民的较差表现状态和功能、癌症患者的年龄和认知障碍以及两组的较差生活质量和抑郁相关。
尽管样本特征不同,但癌症患者和养老院居民报告的尊严相关问题的相似性支持了一项研究,该研究表明恶性和非恶性疾病存在共同的死亡途径。更广泛地了解尊严相关困扰的来源将有助于临床医生提供更有效的临终关怀。