Romano M
Ann Ig. 1989 Nov-Dec;1(6):1351-75.
The author has planned this research utilizing two models theoretically supported through biomechanical and mathematical laws, as they were formulated by means of data selected from paleoanthropological literature and his own clinic-instrumental case studies, on patients who were stimulated through manual pressure. The hypothesis was: is the paradoxical advantage reasonable for attaining and validating the mode of habitual, vertically aligned posture among evolutionary human-like beings through a vertical load upon their spine, as it is possible clinically in the course of rehabilitation? For assessing this argument two models, one biomechanical and the other mathematical were made up. They test the above mentioned load, as it reaches the clinically ascertained threshold value for triggering a firm gravitational alignment which is in agreement with bipedal gait. The suitability of the biomechanical model derives from reliability of the successively advancing levels of evolution (Anagenesis) from monkeys, through apes, to humans. This model was selected among the postural behaviours that were roughly antecedent to Hominidae bipedalism. So it was possible to abstract an Ape-like anteriorly sloping being, who under the above described stimulation through a suitable load on his-her neck-trapezius muscle angle is submitted to the flow of vertical forces as they show a tendency to aligning vertically the gravitational centers of head, thorax, abdominal masses. So, the biomechanics of the Ape-like being becomes the biomechanics of a mere Man-like mode of functional firm vertical alignment. The suitability of the mathematical model is in agreement with the reliability of the body of a Man-like being which is likened to a cylinder progressing chiefly through rotational and translational torques. The detailed sequence of the mechanical laws of stationary and dynamic equilibrium of rigid bodies and of elasto-mechanical law leads us to an understanding of abstracted sites as they in the course of human evolution were centering the characteristic osseous changes of humans which became the adaptative changes such as they are shown in fossil remains. The vertical alignment should have been validating through the advantageous carrying of loads of suitable weight. This, in turn, should have contributed to evolution of functional erect posture and gait through minimization of the centralised force-tension by means of a stepwise widening about some muscular attachments. So the nuchal part of the occipital bone widened while the increased capacity of enlarging pelvis of the evolutionary woman became adapted to accepting a larger fetal skull.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
作者利用两种理论上得到生物力学和数学定律支持的模型来规划这项研究。这些定律是通过从古人类学文献和他自己的临床仪器案例研究中选取的数据制定的,研究对象是那些通过手动按压受到刺激的患者。假设是:通过对类人进化生物的脊柱施加垂直负荷,在康复过程中临床上有可能实现并验证习惯性垂直对齐姿势模式的这种矛盾优势是否合理?为了评估这一论点,构建了两种模型,一种是生物力学模型,另一种是数学模型。它们测试上述负荷,因为该负荷达到了临床上确定的触发稳固重力对齐的阈值,这与两足步态一致。生物力学模型的适用性源于从猴子、猿到人类的连续进化水平(前进演化)的可靠性。该模型是从大致先于人科两足行走的姿势行为中挑选出来的。因此,可以抽象出一个类似猿的前倾生物,在上述通过对其颈斜方肌角度施加适当负荷的刺激下,该生物会受到垂直力的作用,因为这些垂直力倾向于使头部、胸部、腹部的重力中心垂直对齐。所以,类似猿的生物的生物力学就变成了一种纯粹类似人的功能性稳固垂直对齐模式的生物力学。数学模型的适用性与类似人的生物身体的可靠性一致,该生物身体被比作主要通过旋转和平移扭矩前进的圆柱体。刚体的静态和动态平衡以及弹性力学定律的详细顺序使我们理解抽象的部位,因为在人类进化过程中,这些部位是人类特征性骨骼变化的中心,这些变化成为了如化石遗迹中所示的适应性变化。垂直对齐应该通过有利地承载适当重量的负荷来验证。反过来,这应该通过逐步扩大一些肌肉附着点来最小化集中的力张力,从而有助于功能性直立姿势和步态的进化。因此,枕骨的颈部部分变宽,而进化中的女性骨盆增大的能力增强,以适应容纳更大的胎儿头骨。(摘要截断于400字)