Suppr超能文献

评估利钠肽指导治疗在慢性心力衰竭中的益处。

Assessing the benefits of natriuretic peptides-guided therapy in chronic heart failure.

作者信息

Cocco Giuseppe, Jerie Paul

机构信息

Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2015;22(1):5-11. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0041. Epub 2014 May 20.

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a major public heart burden among the ageing population. Optimizing management of patients remains challenging despite many advances in therapy for this pathology. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are related to cardiac morbidity and mortality and their use in guiding treatment might help. Most data on the value of NPs-guided therapy in chronic HF came from centers with high experience in the therapy of HF. Ninety percent of patients had preserved left ventricular function. The story is just too complex to have the final answer. The numbers of treated patients is insufficient to allow a final decision. Most data derive from centers with high skills and were obtained with different assays, different protocols. Many questions are open. Can similar results be obtained in less specialized centers? It is undecided which NP should be used and how high should be the levels to guide the therapy. Which patients might especially benefit from this approach? Is the approach useful in patients with reduced systolic function? Is the strategy as useful in the elderly as in younger patients? In spite of these limitations, available data suggest that it is reasonable to consider the use of NPs to guide the therapy of HF with preserved systolic function. In order to answer some of the questions, a multicenter, prospective study began in January 2013. However, NP guided therapy in chronic HF will only find acceptance in clinical practice if its use results in therapeutic consequences.

摘要

心力衰竭(HF)是老年人群中的一项主要公共心脏负担。尽管针对这种病症的治疗取得了许多进展,但优化患者管理仍然具有挑战性。利钠肽(NPs)与心脏发病率和死亡率相关,其在指导治疗方面的应用可能会有所帮助。关于NPs指导治疗在慢性HF中的价值的大多数数据来自在HF治疗方面经验丰富的中心。90%的患者左心室功能保留。情况过于复杂,尚无最终答案。接受治疗的患者数量不足,无法做出最终决定。大多数数据来自技术高超的中心,且是通过不同的检测方法、不同的方案获得的。许多问题尚未解决。在不太专业的中心能否获得类似结果?尚未确定应使用哪种NP以及指导治疗的水平应多高。哪些患者可能尤其从这种方法中获益?这种方法对收缩功能降低的患者是否有用?该策略在老年患者中与年轻患者中一样有用吗?尽管存在这些局限性,但现有数据表明,考虑使用NPs来指导收缩功能保留的HF的治疗是合理的。为了回答其中一些问题,一项多中心前瞻性研究于2013年1月开始。然而,慢性HF的NP指导治疗只有在其应用产生治疗效果时才会在临床实践中被接受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验