• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的随机、前瞻性、洲际评估:CENTURY II(新型泰尔茂药物洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的临床评估)试验。

A randomized, prospective, intercontinental evaluation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: the CENTURY II (Clinical Evaluation of New Terumo Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.

作者信息

Saito Shigeru, Valdes-Chavarri Mariano, Richardt Gert, Moreno Raul, Iniguez Romo Andrés, Barbato Emanuele, Carrie Didier, Ando Kenji, Merkely Bela, Kornowski Ran, Eltchaninoff Hélène, James Stefan, Wijns William

机构信息

Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hospital Universitaria V. Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 7;35(30):2021-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu210. Epub 2014 May 19.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu210
PMID:24847155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4200026/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to establish safety and efficacy of a new sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer, Ultimaster (BP-SES). Sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer was compared with everolimus-eluting, permanent polymer, Xience stent (PP-EES) in the frame of a CENTURY II clinical trial designed to make global clinical data compliant with regulatory requirements in Europe and Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CENTURY II is a prospective, multicentre, randomized (1 : 1), single blind, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at 58 study sites in Japan, Europe, and Korea. A total of 1123 patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, with implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES), were enrolled [total population (TP)]. Randomization of patients was stratified for the subset of patients matching requirements for DES in Japan (Cohort JR, n = 722). Baseline patient demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both study arms, with minimal differences between the TP and Cohort JR. The primary endpoint, freedom from target lesion failure (TLF) at 9 months-TLF [composite of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization]-was 95.6% with BP-SES and 95.1% with PP-EES (Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). Composite of cardiac death and MI rate was 2.9 and 3.8% (P = 0.40) and target vessel revascularization was 4.5% with BP-SES and 4.2% with PP-EES (P = 0.77). The stent thrombosis rate was 0.9% in both arms. In Cohort JR, freedom from TLF was 95.9 and 94.6% (Pnon-inferiority < 0.0005) with BP-SES and PP-EES, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The new bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent showed safety and efficacy profiles similar to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000006940.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定新型含生物可吸收聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架Ultimaster(BP-SES)的安全性和有效性。在一项名为CENTURY II的临床试验中,将含生物可吸收聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架与含依维莫司的永久性聚合物Xience支架(PP-EES)进行了比较,该试验旨在使全球临床数据符合欧洲和日本的监管要求。

方法与结果

CENTURY II是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机(1:1)、单盲、对照、非劣效性临床试验,在日本、欧洲和韩国的58个研究地点进行。共有1123例需要进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并植入药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者入组[总人群(TP)]。对符合日本DES要求的患者亚组(队列JR,n = 722)进行患者随机分层。两个研究组的基线患者人口统计学和血管造影特征相似,TP和队列JR之间差异极小。主要终点为9个月时无靶病变失败(TLF)-TLF[心源性死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建的复合终点]-BP-SES组为95.6%,PP-EES组为95.1%(非劣效性P<0.0001)。心源性死亡和MI复合率分别为2.9%和3.8%(P = 0.40),BP-SES组靶血管血运重建率为4.5%,PP-EES组为4.2%(P = 0.77)。两组的支架血栓形成率均为0.9%。在队列JR中,BP-SES组和PP-EES组的无TLF率分别为95.9%和94.6%(非劣效性P<0.0005)。

结论

在9个月的随访中,新型生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和有效性与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相似。

研究注册号

UMIN000006940。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/3d20e1e7fe63/ehu21003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/2728addd9a81/ehu21001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/15e367cc60f8/ehu21002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/3d20e1e7fe63/ehu21003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/2728addd9a81/ehu21001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/15e367cc60f8/ehu21002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c308/4200026/3d20e1e7fe63/ehu21003.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized, prospective, intercontinental evaluation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: the CENTURY II (Clinical Evaluation of New Terumo Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.一种生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的随机、前瞻性、洲际评估:CENTURY II(新型泰尔茂药物洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的临床评估)试验。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 7;35(30):2021-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu210. Epub 2014 May 19.
2
Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial.比较生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架和永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者的长期临床结局:CENTURY II 随机临床试验 5 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95(2):175-184. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28224. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Comparison of sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer to everolimus eluting stent with permanent polymer in bifurcation lesions: Results from CENTURY II trial.在分叉病变中,生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的比较:CENTURY II试验结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1092-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26150. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
4
A randomized comparison of novel bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CENTURY II high risk ACS substudy.新型生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机对照研究:CENTURY II高危急性冠状动脉综合征亚组研究
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3287-3297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after bioresorbable and permanent polymer drug-eluting stent implantation: final five-year results of the CENTURY II randomised clinical trial.生物可吸收和永久性聚合物药物洗脱支架植入后的长期临床结果:CENTURY II 随机临床试验的最终五年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jun 8;14(3):e343-e351. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00358.
7
Bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent compared with permanent polymer everolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation for treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease: CENTURY II trial.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架植入治疗小血管冠状动脉疾病的比较:CENTURY II试验
EuroIntervention. 2016 Jun 12;12(2):e167-74. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A30.
8
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
9
Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架9个月随访时的血管反应:来自CENTURY II试验的光学相干断层扫描子研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;17(1):34-40. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev203. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Ultimaster™ in Unselected Korean Population: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study From Korean Multicenter Ultimaster Registry.可降解聚合物Ultimaster™西罗莫司洗脱支架在韩国未选择人群中的疗效与安全性:来自韩国多中心Ultimaster注册研究的一项多中心、前瞻性观察性研究
Korean Circ J. 2024 Jun;54(6):339-350. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0023. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
2
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
Variability in research culture across busy catheterisation labs in the Asia-Pacific region.
亚太地区繁忙的导管插入实验室之间研究文化的差异。
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Feb 29;10(1):26-33. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00005. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Comparative efficacy of different Chinese patent medicines in preventing restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.不同中成药预防经皮冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 5;14:1265766. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265766. eCollection 2023.
5
Cells in Atherosclerosis: Focus on Cellular Senescence from Basic Science to Clinical Practice.动脉粥样硬化中的细胞:从基础科学到临床实践聚焦于细胞衰老。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 5;24(24):17129. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417129.
6
Evolution of Coronary Stent Platforms: A Brief Overview of Currently Used Drug-Eluting Stents.冠状动脉支架平台的演变:当前使用的药物洗脱支架简要概述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 24;12(21):6711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216711.
7
Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures.当代药物洗脱支架在接受复杂高风险特定手术患者中的比较。
JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 1;2(2):182-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.008. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Comparison of Contemporary Drug-eluting Coronary Stents - Is Any Stent Better than the Others?当代药物洗脱冠状动脉支架的比较——是否有某种支架比其他支架更好?
Heart Int. 2020 Jun 18;14(1):34-42. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.34. eCollection 2020.
9
A Review of the Ultrathin Orsiro Biodegradable Polymer Drug-eluting Stent in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.超薄Orsiro可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的综述
Heart Int. 2019 Dec 23;13(2):17-24. doi: 10.17925/HI.2019.13.2.17. eCollection 2019.
10
Five-year clinical outcomes of a 2.25 mm sirolimus-eluting stent in Japanese patients with very small coronary artery disease: final results of the CENTURY JSV study.CENTURY JSV 研究:在日本小血管病变患者中应用 2.25mm 西罗莫司洗脱支架的 5 年临床结果。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Apr;38(2):194-201. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00890-y. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.生物可吸收聚合物与耐用聚合物载药及裸金属支架的临床疗效:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
4
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
5
Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.可生物降解聚合物载比伐卢定洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 16;62(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.045. Epub 2013 May 15.
6
Global cardiovascular device innovation: Japan-USA synergies: Harmonization by Doing (HBD) program, a consortium of regulatory agencies, medical device industry, and academic institutions.全球心血管设备创新:日美协同:通过(HBD)计划实现协调,该计划由监管机构、医疗器械行业和学术机构组成的联盟。
Circ J. 2013;77(7):1714-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-1431. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
7
Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.无聚合物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(COMPARE II):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
8
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement.非劣效性和等效性随机试验报告:CONSORT 2010 声明的扩展。
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.
9
Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis at 4 years in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the ISAR-TEST 3, ISAR-TEST 4, and LEADERS randomized trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架 4 年内降低支架血栓形成风险:来自 ISAR-TEST 3、ISAR-TEST 4 和 LEADERS 随机试验的个体患者数据的汇总分析。
Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(10):1214-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs086. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
10
Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.心血管临床试验的标准化出血定义:出血学术研究联盟的共识报告。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449.