Chien J H, Liu C C, Kim J H, Markman T M, Lenz F A
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Aug 15;112(4):824-33. doi: 10.1152/jn.00209.2014. Epub 2014 May 21.
The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1,400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1,200-1,600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1,200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.
对疼痛刺激的非锁相脑电图反应通常被描述为阿尔法波段振荡活动降低(事件相关去同步化,ERD)。最近有报道称伽马波段活动增加(事件相关同步化,ERS)。我们现在检验了这样一个假设:当两种刺激的基线显著性相同时,且在实验过程中通过计数激光和计数电刺激任务来调节显著性,那么对非疼痛性皮肤电刺激的非锁相反应与对疼痛性皮肤激光刺激的非锁相反应是不同的。这两种刺激以随机顺序在单个序列中呈现,强度在相同躯体部位产生相同的基线显著性。对激光刺激的反应在时频域中有五个窗口(指定为窗口I - V):早期(200 - 400毫秒)和晚期(600 - 1400毫秒)的δ/θ ERS、500 - 900毫秒的阿尔法ERD、1200 - 1600毫秒的贝塔ERS(反弹)以及800 - 1200毫秒的伽马ERS。对电刺激也发现了类似的ERS/ERD活动窗口。个体参与者在与总体分析一致的窗口中非常普遍地存在活动。顶叶通道的ERS/ERD的线性回归最常见于与感觉(疼痛或不愉快)或注意力(显著性)相关的测量中。总体而言,在窗口I - δ/θ和窗口V - 伽马中发现了刺激方式的主要效应,并且在所有五个窗口中都发现了刺激方式与任务的交互作用。所有显著的交互项都将刺激方式作为一个因素。因此,刺激方式是解释我们结果的最常见因素,这与我们的假设一致。