Devonshire Alison S, Whale Alexandra S, Gutteridge Alice, Jones Gerwyn, Cowen Simon, Foy Carole A, Huggett Jim F
Molecular and Cell Biology Team, LGC Ltd, Queen's Road, Teddington, TW11 0LY, UK,
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Oct;406(26):6499-512. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3. Epub 2014 May 24.
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity.
循环游离DNA(cfDNA)正成为产前检测、癌症诊断和癌症监测的重要临床分析物。提取阶段对于确保测量少数核酸片段(如主要为母体cfDNA中的胎儿来源序列)的分析方法的临床敏感性至关重要。因此,需要进行质量控制来测量提取效率、片段大小偏差和产量,以验证cfDNA方法。在一项研究中,我们评估了一种外部DNA加标物在监测这些参数方面的效用,该研究比较了三种特定的cfDNA提取方法[QIAamp循环核酸(CNA)试剂盒、NucleoSpin血浆XS(NS)试剂盒和FitAmp血浆/血清DNA分离(FA)试剂盒]与常用的QIAamp DNA血液微型(DBM)试剂盒。我们发现,试剂盒的提取效率排序为CNA试剂盒>DBM试剂盒>NS试剂盒>FA试剂盒,并且与DBM试剂盒相比,CNA和NS试剂盒在提取物中能更好地呈现较小的DNA片段。我们通过比较血浆样本中七种不同参考基因检测的定量PCR测量结果并用数字PCR进行验证,研究了改进cfDNA产量报告的方法。我们注意到,基于某些靶基因(如TERT)测量的cfDNA量平均比其他检测(如ERV3)高出两倍多。我们得出结论,使用GeNorm方法对多个参考基因进行分析和平均,可以更可靠地估计总cfDNA量。