Sorber Laure, Zwaenepoel Karen, Deschoolmeester Vanessa, Roeyen Geert, Lardon Filip, Rolfo Christian, Pauwels Patrick
Center for Oncological Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Department of Hepatobiliary Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;19(1):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a sensitive biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring has resulted in a need for efficient and standardized cfDNA isolation. In this study, we compared the isolation efficiency of the QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit (QIA) with four other cfDNA isolation kits: the PME free-circulating DNA Extraction Kit (PME), the Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit (RSC), the EpiQuick Circulating Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (EQ), and two consecutive versions of the NEXTprep-Mag cfDNA Isolation Kit (NpM). cfDNA was isolated from 10 plasma samples, of which five contained KRAS mutated cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). Digital droplet PCR was used to quantify the total cfDNA concentration as well as the KRAS mutated ctDNA fraction. cfDNA integrity was assessed with real-time quantitative PCR. The QIA and the RSC kits displayed similar isolation efficiencies of both KRAS mutated ctDNA and nonmutated cfDNA, whereas the yield generated by the PME and NpM kits was significantly lower. Real-time quantitative PCR indicated the presence of digital droplet PCR inhibiting agents in the eluates of the NpM and EQ kits. To conclude, this study presents two highly efficient isolation kits for cfDNA isolation, of which the RSC kit has the advantage of a fully automated protocol over the labor-intensive QIA kit.
将游离DNA(cfDNA)作为癌症诊断和监测的敏感生物标志物进行分析,导致需要高效且标准化的cfDNA分离方法。在本研究中,我们将QIAamp循环核酸试剂盒(QIA)与其他四种cfDNA分离试剂盒的分离效率进行了比较:PME游离循环DNA提取试剂盒(PME)、Maxwell RSC ccfDNA血浆试剂盒(RSC)、EpiQuick循环游离DNA分离试剂盒(EQ)以及两个连续版本的NEXTprep-Mag cfDNA分离试剂盒(NpM)。从10份血浆样本中分离cfDNA,其中5份含有KRAS突变的游离肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)。采用数字液滴PCR定量总cfDNA浓度以及KRAS突变的ctDNA比例。通过实时定量PCR评估cfDNA完整性。QIA和RSC试剂盒对KRAS突变的ctDNA和未突变的cfDNA均显示出相似的分离效率,而PME和NpM试剂盒的产量显著较低。实时定量PCR表明NpM和EQ试剂盒的洗脱液中存在数字液滴PCR抑制剂。总之,本研究展示了两种用于cfDNA分离的高效试剂盒,其中RSC试剂盒相较于劳动强度大的QIA试剂盒具有全自动化流程的优势。