Suppr超能文献

长期 1 型糖尿病患者低血糖意识恢复:一项比较胰岛素泵与多次皮下注射和连续与常规血糖自我监测的多中心 2×2 析因随机对照试验(HypoCOMPaSS)。

Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS).

机构信息

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, U.K.

Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2114-22. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0030. Epub 2014 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) can be improved and severe hypoglycemia (SH) prevented in type 1 diabetes, we compared an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) with multiple daily injections (MDIs) and adjuvant real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT) with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in adults with type 1 diabetes and IAH was conducted. All received comparable education, support, and congruent therapeutic targets aimed at rigorous avoidance of biochemical hypoglycemia without relaxing overall control. Primary end point was between-intervention difference in 24-week hypoglycemia awareness (Gold score).

RESULTS

A total of 96 participants (mean diabetes duration 29 years) were randomized. Overall, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤3.0 mmol/L) decreased (53 ± 63 to 24 ± 56 min/24 h; P = 0.004 [t test]) without deterioration in HbA1c. Hypoglycemia awareness improved (5.1 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.6; P = 0.0001 [t test]) with decreased SH (8.9 ± 13.4 to 0.8 ± 1.8 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.0001 [t test]). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in awareness comparing CSII with MDI (4.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7; difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.6 to 0.8) and RT with SMBG (4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7; difference -0.3; 95% CI -1.0 to 0.4). Between-group analyses demonstrated comparable reductions in SH, fear of hypoglycemia, and insulin doses with equivalent HbA1c. Treatment satisfaction was higher with CSII than MDI (32 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 6; P = 0.0003 [t test]), but comparable with SMBG and RT (30 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5; P = 0.79 [t test]).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoglycemia awareness can be improved and recurrent SH prevented in long-standing type 1 diabetes without relaxing HbA1c. Similar biomedical outcomes can be attained with conventional MDI and SMBG regimens compared with CSII/RT, although satisfaction was higher with CSII.

摘要

目的

为了确定在 1 型糖尿病中,是否可以改善对低血糖的认知障碍(IAH)并预防严重低血糖(SH),我们比较了胰岛素泵(持续皮下胰岛素输注[CSII])与多次每日注射(MDI)和辅助实时连续血糖监测(RT)与常规自我监测血糖(SMBG)。

研究设计和方法

对患有 1 型糖尿病和 IAH 的成年人进行了为期 24 周的 2×2 析因随机对照试验。所有参与者都接受了类似的教育、支持和一致的治疗目标,旨在严格避免生化性低血糖,而不放松整体控制。主要终点是 24 周时低血糖意识(Gold 评分)的干预间差异。

结果

共纳入 96 名参与者(平均糖尿病病程 29 年)进行随机分组。总体而言,生化性低血糖(≤3.0mmol/L)减少(53±63 分钟/24 小时至 24±56 分钟/24 小时;P=0.004 [t 检验]),而 HbA1c 无恶化。低血糖意识改善(5.1±1.1 至 4.1±1.6;P=0.0001 [t 检验]),同时 SH 减少(8.9±13.4 至 0.8±1.8 次/患者年;P=0.0001 [t 检验])。在 24 周时,CSII 与 MDI(4.1±1.6 与 4.2±1.7;差异 0.1;95%CI-0.6 至 0.8)和 RT 与 SMBG(4.3±1.6 与 4.0±1.7;差异-0.3;95%CI-1.0 至 0.4)之间的意识比较无显著差异。组间分析显示,SH、对低血糖的恐惧和胰岛素剂量均有相似的减少,HbA1c 相当。CSII 的治疗满意度高于 MDI(32±3 与 29±6;P=0.0003 [t 检验]),但与 SMBG 和 RT 相当(30±5 与 30±5;P=0.79 [t 检验])。

结论

在长期 1 型糖尿病中,无需放松 HbA1c 即可改善低血糖意识并预防反复性 SH。与 CSII/RT 相比,传统的 MDI 和 SMBG 方案可以获得相似的生物医学结果,尽管 CSII 的满意度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验