Suppr超能文献

不同难度平衡任务中压力中心移动的定量和可靠性。

Quantification and reliability of center of pressure movement during balance tasks of varying difficulty.

机构信息

Human Performance Laboratory (HPL), Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada.

Human Performance Laboratory (HPL), Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2014 Jun;40(2):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.208. Epub 2014 May 9.

Abstract

Postural control is often assessed by quantifying the magnitude of the center of pressure (COP) movement. However, these measures usually focus on the gross amount of movement and ignore the temporal structure of the COP signal. A novel non-linear analysis technique was recently developed to characterize the temporal structure of the COP signal with an output termed the entropic half-life [E(1/2)]. The E(1/2) reflects how much of the previous postural position is used to determine the current postural control strategy (memory effect). The purpose of this study was to quantify the E(1/2) and four COP movement magnitude measurements (medio-lateral and anterior-posterior excursion, path length, 95% ellipse area) for balance tasks increasing in sensory difficulty, as well as the test-retest reliability of each measure. Twenty-seven healthy young adults completed single limb stance tasks varying in sensory difficulty (rigid surface eyes open, rigid surface eyes closed, foam surface eyes open) on two separate occasions. Relative reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,3). Absolute reliability was assessed using the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and the sensitivity of the measurement to true changes was assessed using the minimal detectable change (MDC95). The E(1/2) was found to have excellent reliability for all tasks tested (ICC range 0.82-0.91, SEM range 3.5-14.1 mm, MCD95 range 9.7-39.2 mm). The high reliability of the E(1/2) was comparable to that of movement magnitude measurements. This may be used in order to better understand the underlying motor control system.

摘要

姿势控制通常通过量化压力中心(COP)运动的幅度来评估。然而,这些措施通常侧重于运动的总量,而忽略了 COP 信号的时间结构。最近开发了一种新的非线性分析技术,用于用熵半衰期 [E(1/2)] 来描述 COP 信号的时间结构。E(1/2)反映了以前的姿势位置有多少被用来确定当前的姿势控制策略(记忆效应)。本研究的目的是量化 E(1/2)和四个 COP 运动幅度测量值(横向和前后偏移、路径长度、95%椭圆面积),用于增加感觉难度的平衡任务,以及每个测量值的测试-再测试可靠性。27 名健康年轻成年人在两次不同的时间完成了不同感觉难度的单腿站立任务(刚性表面睁眼、刚性表面闭眼、泡沫表面睁眼)。相对可靠性使用组内相关系数(ICC3,3)进行评估。绝对可靠性使用测量标准误差(SEM)进行评估,测量对真实变化的敏感性使用最小可检测变化(MDC95)进行评估。对于所有测试的任务,E(1/2)都具有极好的可靠性(ICC 范围为 0.82-0.91,SEM 范围为 3.5-14.1mm,MCD95 范围为 9.7-39.2mm)。E(1/2)的高可靠性与运动幅度测量值相当。这可以用于更好地理解潜在的运动控制系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验