Marshell R, Kearney-Ramos T, Brents L K, Hyatt W S, Tai S, Prather P L, Fantegrossi W E
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W, Markham Street - Mail 638, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199, United States.
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W, Markham Street - Mail 638, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199, United States.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Sep;124:40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 21.
Human users of synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) JWH-018 and JWH-073 typically smoke these drugs, but preclinical studies usually rely on injection for drug delivery. We used the cannabinoid tetrad and drug discrimination to compare in vivo effects of inhaled drugs with injected doses of these two SCBs, as well as with the phytocannabinoid Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC). Mice inhaled various doses of Δ(9)-THC, JWH-018 or JWH-073, or were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with these same compounds. Rectal temperature, tail flick latency in response to radiant heat, horizontal bar catalepsy, and suppression of locomotor activity were assessed in each animal. In separate studies, mice were trained to discriminate Δ(9)-THC (IP) from saline, and tests were performed with inhaled or injected doses of the SCBs. Both SCBs elicited Δ(9)-THC-like effects across both routes of administration, and effects following inhalation were attenuated by pretreatment with the CB1 antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant. No cataleptic effects were observed following inhalation, but all compounds induced catalepsy following injection. Injected JWH-018 and JWH-073 fully substituted for Δ(9)-THC, but substitution was partial (JWH-073) or required relatively higher doses (JWH-018) when drugs were inhaled. These studies demonstrate that the SCBs JWH-018 and JWH-073 elicit dose-dependent, CB1 receptor-mediated Δ(9)-THC-like effects in mice when delivered via inhalation or via injection. Across these routes of administration, differences in cataleptic effects and, perhaps, discriminative stimulus effects, may implicate the involvement of active metabolites of these compounds.
合成大麻素(SCBs)JWH - 018和JWH - 073的人类使用者通常吸食这些毒品,但临床前研究通常依靠注射给药。我们使用大麻素四联症和药物辨别法,比较吸入这些药物与注射这两种SCBs以及植物大麻素Δ(9)-四氢大麻酚(Δ(9)-THC)的体内效应。小鼠吸入不同剂量的Δ(9)-THC、JWH - 018或JWH - 073,或腹腔注射相同的化合物。评估每只动物的直肠温度、对辐射热的甩尾潜伏期、水平杆僵住症以及运动活动抑制情况。在单独的研究中,训练小鼠辨别腹腔注射的Δ(9)-THC和生理盐水,并对吸入或注射剂量的SCBs进行测试。两种SCBs在两种给药途径中均引发类似Δ(9)-THC的效应,吸入后的效应可被CB1拮抗剂/反向激动剂利莫那班预处理减弱。吸入后未观察到僵住症效应,但所有化合物注射后均诱导僵住症。注射的JWH - 018和JWH - 073可完全替代Δ(9)-THC,但吸入药物时替代作用是部分的(JWH - 073)或需要相对更高的剂量(JWH - 018)。这些研究表明,SCBs JWH - 018和JWH - 073通过吸入或注射给药时,在小鼠中引发剂量依赖性、CB1受体介导的类似Δ(9)-THC的效应。在这些给药途径中,僵住症效应以及可能的辨别性刺激效应的差异,可能意味着这些化合物的活性代谢产物参与其中。