• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏侧化感知:注意力在空间关系处理中的作用。

Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.

作者信息

van der Ham Ineke J M, Postma Albert, Laeng Bruno

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Utrecht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.006
PMID:24858009
Abstract

Any spatial situation can be approached either categorically - the window is to my left - or coordinately - the glass is 20cm away from the bottle. Since the first description of the distinction between categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing, it has often been shown that they are processed by at least partially different underlying mechanisms, mainly located in the left and right hemisphere, respectively. A number of recent studies have suggested that spatial attention plays a particularly important part in the perception of space: categorical processing benefits from a local focus of attention, and coordinate processing profits from a global focus of attention. This suggests that the lateralization pattern is modified by the concurrent size of the attentional focus, and is consequently more dynamic than previously thought. Therefore, a thorough revision of earlier theories on spatial relation processing is in order. In this review, we present a new model on lateralization of spatial relation processing that explicitly describes the role of spatial attention.

摘要

任何空间情境都可以通过分类方式来描述——窗户在我的左边——或者通过坐标方式来描述——玻璃杯距离瓶子20厘米。自从首次描述分类和坐标空间关系处理之间的区别以来,人们经常发现它们是由至少部分不同的潜在机制处理的,这些机制主要分别位于左半球和右半球。最近的一些研究表明,空间注意力在空间感知中起着特别重要的作用:分类处理受益于局部注意力焦点,而坐标处理则受益于全局注意力焦点。这表明,偏侧化模式会受到注意力焦点同时大小的影响,因此比之前认为的更具动态性。因此,有必要对早期关于空间关系处理的理论进行全面修订。在这篇综述中,我们提出了一个关于空间关系处理偏侧化的新模型,该模型明确描述了空间注意力的作用。

相似文献

1
Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.偏侧化感知:注意力在空间关系处理中的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: a Granger causal model approach.空间关系处理中自上而下注意的半球侧化:一种格兰杰因果模型方法。
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Apr;41(7):914-24. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12846. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study.工作记忆中的类别和坐标空间关系:一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 10;1297:70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.088. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
4
Atypical hemispheric dominance for attention: functional MRI topography.注意力的非典型半球优势:功能磁共振成像地形图
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Sep;25(9):1197-208. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600114.
5
The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing.分类和坐标空间处理中半球差异的时间进程。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 18;45(11):2492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.021. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
6
Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.偏侧指向不会导致认知偏差。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.注意范围的变化改变了类别和坐标空间关系的编码。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
8
The study of hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations in animals.动物中类别和坐标空间关系的半球特化研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(9):1524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.021. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
9
Hemispheric lateralization of spatial attention in right- and left-hemispheric language dominance.右半球和左半球语言优势中空间注意力的半球侧化
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Mar 30;158(2):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.09.016.
10
The effect of attentional scope on spatial relation processing: a case study.注意广度对空间关系加工的影响:一项个案研究。
Neurocase. 2013;19(5):505-12. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2012.701640. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Approach to Assessment of Perceptual-Motor Efficiency and Training-Induced Improvement in the Performance Capabilities of Elite Athletes.一种评估精英运动员感知运动效率及训练诱导的运动能力提升的新方法。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Oct 1;3:729729. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.729729. eCollection 2021.
2
Horses show individual level lateralisation when inspecting an unfamiliar and unexpected stimulus.马在检查不熟悉和意外的刺激物时表现出个体水平的侧化。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255688. eCollection 2021.
3
Functional and structural benefits of separately operating right and left thalamo-cortical networks.
左右丘脑-皮质网络独立运作的功能和结构益处。
J Neurol. 2018 Oct;265(Suppl 1):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8824-9. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
4
Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.偏侧指向不会导致认知偏差。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.时间占用空间:多任务处理对并发空间处理的选择性影响。
Cogn Process. 2017 Aug;18(3):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0799-4. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Connectivity measures in the Poffenberger paradigm indicate hemispheric asymmetries.波芬伯格范式中的连通性测量表明了半球不对称性。
Funct Neurol. 2016 Oct/Dec;31(4):249-256. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2016.31.4.249.
7
Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?分类空间关系是通过在物体之间转移视觉注意力来编码的吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0163141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163141. eCollection 2016.
8
Frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations in a "what was where" task.“何物在何处”任务中的参照系以及分类/坐标空间关系
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2687-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4672-y. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Hemispheric differences in relational reasoning: novel insights based on an old technique.关系推理中的半球差异:基于一项古老技术的新见解。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 9;9:55. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00055. eCollection 2015.