• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间占用空间:多任务处理对并发空间处理的选择性影响。

Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.

作者信息

Mäntylä Timo, Coni Valentina, Kubik Veit, Todorov Ivo, Del Missier Fabio

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2017 Aug;18(3):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0799-4. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-017-0799-4
PMID:28315969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527076/
Abstract

Many everyday activities require coordination and monitoring of complex relations of future goals and deadlines. Cognitive offloading may provide an efficient strategy for reducing control demands by representing future goals and deadlines as a pattern of spatial relations. We tested the hypothesis that multiple-task monitoring involves time-to-space transformational processes, and that these spatial effects are selective with greater demands on coordinate (metric) than categorical (nonmetric) spatial relation processing. Participants completed a multitasking session in which they monitored four series of deadlines, running on different time scales, while making concurrent coordinate or categorical spatial judgments. We expected and found that multitasking taxes concurrent coordinate, but not categorical, spatial processing. Furthermore, males showed a better multitasking performance than females. These findings provide novel experimental evidence for the hypothesis that efficient multitasking involves metric relational processing.

摘要

许多日常活动都需要对未来目标和期限的复杂关系进行协调与监控。认知卸载可能提供一种有效的策略,通过将未来目标和期限表示为空间关系模式来降低控制需求。我们测试了这样一个假设:多任务监控涉及时间到空间的转换过程,并且这些空间效应具有选择性,对坐标(度量)空间关系处理的要求高于类别(非度量)空间关系处理。参与者完成了一个多任务环节,在这个环节中,他们监控四个在不同时间尺度上运行的期限系列,同时进行并发的坐标或类别空间判断。我们预期并发现,多任务会对并发的坐标空间处理造成负担,但不会对类别空间处理造成负担。此外,男性的多任务表现优于女性。这些发现为有效多任务涉及度量关系处理这一假设提供了新的实验证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/5527076/6629e985ca40/10339_2017_799_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/5527076/b2e7ce2834d9/10339_2017_799_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/5527076/6629e985ca40/10339_2017_799_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/5527076/b2e7ce2834d9/10339_2017_799_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e37/5527076/6629e985ca40/10339_2017_799_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.时间占用空间:多任务处理对并发空间处理的选择性影响。
Cogn Process. 2017 Aug;18(3):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0799-4. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
2
Deadlines in space: Selective effects of coordinate spatial processing in multitasking.太空任务中的截止期限:多任务处理中坐标空间处理的选择性影响。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1216-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0529-z.
3
Electrophysiological correlates of spatial processing during multitasking.多任务处理期间空间处理的电生理相关性。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107152. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Monitoring Multiple Deadlines Relies on Spatial Processing in Posterior Parietal Cortex.监测多个截止日期依赖于后顶叶皮层的空间处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;31(10):1468-1483. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01435. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability.性别差异在多重任务处理中反映了空间能力。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):514-20. doi: 10.1177/0956797612459660. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
6
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.人类多重任务中的认知结构、灵活性和可塑性——双任务和任务转换研究的综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.偏侧指向不会导致认知偏差。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization.多任务处理中任务协调策略的个体偏好:探索偏好的处理模式与反应组织策略之间的联系。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):577-591. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01291-7. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Tracking and discrete dual task performance for different visual spatial stimulus-response mappings with focal and ambient vision.使用焦点和周围视觉跟踪和离散双重任务在不同视觉空间刺激-反应映射下的表现。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Feb;67:39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.对刻板印象的检验:任务转换和双重任务情境下多重任务成本的性别差异案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions.空间能力有助于延迟意图的记忆。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Aug 8;5(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00229-2.
2
Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.对刻板印象的检验:任务转换和双重任务情境下多重任务成本的性别差异案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150. eCollection 2019.
3
Explaining the SPoARC and SNARC effects with knowledge structures: An expertise account.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.认知预测因素对常见多重任务能力的影响:工作记忆、注意力控制和流体智力的贡献。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Nov;145(11):1473-1492. doi: 10.1037/xge0000219.
2
Deadlines in space: Selective effects of coordinate spatial processing in multitasking.太空任务中的截止期限:多任务处理中坐标空间处理的选择性影响。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1216-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0529-z.
3
How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left-right axis?
用知识结构解释 SPoARC 和 SNARC 效应:专长观点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):434-451. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01582-0.
在左右轴线上,心理时间和空间的联系有多紧密?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1878-83. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000129. Epub 2015 May 11.
4
Age-related differences in multiple task monitoring.多任务监测中的年龄相关差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e107619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107619. eCollection 2014.
5
Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.偏侧化感知:注意力在空间关系处理中的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Estradiol and mental rotation: relation to dimensionality, difficulty, or angular disparity?雌二醇与心理旋转:与维度、难度还是角度差异有关?
Horm Behav. 2014 Mar;65(3):238-48. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
7
Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: a study of unilateral stroke patients.范畴和坐标空间功能的偏侧化:单侧脑卒中患者研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Summer;6(3):189-203. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.189.
8
The tangle of space and time in human cognition.人类认知中的时空纠结。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 May;17(5):220-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
9
Gender invariance in multitasking: a comment on Mäntylä (2013).多任务处理中的性别不变性:对曼蒂拉(2013年)的评论
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):809-10: discussion 811-2. doi: 10.1177/0956797612465199. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
10
Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability.性别差异在多重任务处理中反映了空间能力。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):514-20. doi: 10.1177/0956797612459660. Epub 2013 Mar 5.