Koulikov Dmitry, Mohler Maura C, Mehedint Diana C, Attwood Kristopher, Wilding Gregory E, Mohler James L
Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
J Urol. 2014 Nov;192(5):1390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.088. Epub 2014 May 21.
We determined whether the pattern of low detectable prostate specific antigen during the first 3 years of followup after radical prostatectomy would predict subsequent biochemical recurrence.
An institutional database was queried to identify 1,136 patients who underwent open retropubic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 5, 1993 and December 29, 2008. After applying exclusion criteria we used serum prostate specific antigen and the prostate specific antigen pattern during the first 3 years of followup to divide 566 men into 3 groups, including 1) undetectable prostate specific antigen (0.03 ng/ml or less), 2) low detectable-stable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, no 2 subsequent increases and/or prostate specific antigen velocity less than 0.05 ng per year) and 3) low detectable-unstable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 subsequent increases according to NCCN criteria and/or prostate specific antigen velocity 0.05 ng per year or greater). The primary end point was biochemical recurrence, defined as prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater, or receipt of radiation therapy beyond 3 years of followup.
Seven-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 95%, 94% and 37% in the undetectable, low detectable-stable and low detectable-unstable groups, respectively (log rank test p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis the prostate specific antigen pattern during 3 years postoperatively (undetectable vs low detectable-unstable HR 15.9 and vs low detectable-stable HR 1.6), pathological T stage (pT2 vs greater than pT2 HR 1.8), pathological Gleason score (less than 7 vs 7 HR 2.3 and less than 7 vs 8-10 HR 3.3) and surgical margins (negative vs positive HR 1.8) significantly predicted biochemical recurrence.
The combination of prostate specific antigen velocity and NCCN criteria for biochemical recurrence separated well men with low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy into those who required treatment and those who could be safely watched.
我们确定了根治性前列腺切除术后前3年低可检测前列腺特异性抗原的模式是否能预测随后的生化复发。
查询机构数据库,以识别1993年1月5日至2008年12月29日期间接受开放性耻骨后或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的1136例患者。应用排除标准后,我们使用血清前列腺特异性抗原和随访前3年的前列腺特异性抗原模式将566名男性分为3组,包括:1)不可检测的前列腺特异性抗原(0.03 ng/ml或更低),2)低可检测-稳定的前列腺特异性抗原(大于0.03且小于0.2 ng/ml,随后无2次升高和/或前列腺特异性抗原速度小于每年0.05 ng),以及3)低可检测-不稳定的前列腺特异性抗原(大于0.03且小于0.2 ng/ml,根据NCCN标准随后有2次升高和/或前列腺特异性抗原速度为每年0.05 ng或更高)。主要终点是生化复发,定义为前列腺特异性抗原0.2 ng/ml或更高,或随访3年后接受放射治疗。
不可检测组、低可检测-稳定组和低可检测-不稳定组的7年无生化复发生存率分别为95%、94%和37%(对数秩检验p<0.0001)。多因素分析显示,术后3年的前列腺特异性抗原模式(不可检测组与低可检测-不稳定组HR为15.9,与低可检测-稳定组HR为1.6)、病理T分期(pT2与大于pT2 HR为1.8)、病理Gleason评分(小于7分与7分HR为2.3,小于7分与8 - 10分HR为3.3)以及手术切缘(阴性与阳性HR为1.8)显著预测生化复发。
前列腺特异性抗原速度和NCCN生化复发标准相结合,能很好地将根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原低可检测的男性分为需要治疗的和可安全观察的两类。