Zeng F F, Xue W Q, Cao W T, Wu B H, Xie H L, Fan F, Zhu H L, Chen Y M
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Aug;25(8):2131-41. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2741-2. Epub 2014 May 27.
This case-control study compared the associations of four widely used diet-quality scoring systems with the risk of hip fractures and assessed their utility in elderly Chinese. We found that individuals avoiding a low-quality diet have a lower risk of hip fractures in elderly Chinese.
Few studies examined the associations of diet-quality scores on bone health, and no studies were available in Asians and compared their validity and utility in a study. We assessed the associations and utility of four widely used diet-quality scoring systems with the risk of hip fractures.
A case-control study of 726 patients with hip fractures (diagnosed within 2 weeks) aged 55-80 years and 726 age- (within 3 years) and gender-matched controls was conducted in Guangdong, China (2009-2013). Dietary intake was assessed using a 79-item food frequency questionnaire with face-to-face interviews, and the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005, 12 items), the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI, 8 items), the Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I, 17 items), and the alternate Mediterranean Diet Score (aMed, 9 items) (the simplest one) were calculated.
All greater values of the diet-quality scores were significantly associated with a similar decreased risk of hip fractures (all p trends <0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidential intervals (95% CIs) comparing the extreme groups of diet-quality scores were 0.29 (0.18, 0.46) (HEI-2005), 0.20 (0.12, 0.33) (aHEI), 0.25 (0.16, 0.39) (DQI-I), and 0.28 (0.18, 0.43) (aMed) in total subjects; and the corresponding ORs ranged from 0.04 to 0.27 for men and from 0.26 to 0.44 for women (all p trends <0.05), respectively.
Avoiding a low-quality diet is associated with a lower risk of hip fractures, and the aMed score is the best scoring system due to its equivalent performance and simplicity for the user.
本病例对照研究比较了四种广泛使用的饮食质量评分系统与髋部骨折风险的关联,并评估了它们在中国老年人中的效用。我们发现,在中国老年人中,避免低质量饮食的个体髋部骨折风险较低。
很少有研究探讨饮食质量评分与骨骼健康的关联,在亚洲人中没有相关研究,也没有在一项研究中比较它们的有效性和效用。我们评估了四种广泛使用的饮食质量评分系统与髋部骨折风险的关联及效用。
在中国广东进行了一项病例对照研究,纳入726例年龄在55 - 80岁、髋部骨折(诊断在2周内)的患者以及726例年龄(3年内)和性别匹配的对照。通过79项食物频率问卷进行面对面访谈来评估饮食摄入量,并计算健康饮食指数 - 2005(HEI - 2005,12项)、替代健康饮食指数(aHEI,8项)、国际饮食质量指数(DQI - I,17项)和替代地中海饮食评分(aMed,9项)(最简单的一种)。
饮食质量评分的所有更高值均与髋部骨折风险的显著降低相关(所有p趋势<0.001)。比较饮食质量评分极端组的多变量调整比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)在所有受试者中分别为:HEI - 2005为0.29(0.18,0.46),aHEI为0.20(0.12,0.33),DQI - I为0.25(0.16,0.39),aMed为0.28(0.18,0.43);男性相应的OR范围为0.04至0.27,女性为0.26至0.44(所有p趋势<0.05)。
避免低质量饮食与较低的髋部骨折风险相关,并且aMed评分是最佳评分系统,因为其性能相当且对用户来说很简单。