Lee Agnes Y Y, Carrier Marc
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Thromb Res. 2014 May;133 Suppl 2:S167-71. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(14)50027-8.
Therapeutic options for the management of venous thromboembolism have expanded with the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). These agents offer significant advantages in convenience and simplicity, and large, well-designed clinical trials have shown that NOACs are comparable in efficacy and safety to traditional therapy using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by a vitamin K antagonist in most patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general oncology population because randomized clinical trials have included very few and highly selected patients with cancer. Furthermore, how well these agents perform in comparison to LMWH, the drug of choice for both initial and long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, has not been evaluated. Other limitations of particular importance to patients with cancer, such as chemotherapy interaction, renal impairment, or hepatic involvement with metastases also need to be carefully considered because these patients have higher risks of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding. The use of NOACs is currently not recommended by international consensus guidelines but is now being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results are eagerly awaited.
随着新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)的引入,静脉血栓栓塞症的治疗选择有所增加。这些药物在便利性和简易性方面具有显著优势,大型、设计良好的临床试验表明,在大多数深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞患者中,NOACs在疗效和安全性上与使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)继以维生素K拮抗剂的传统疗法相当。然而,这些结果不能外推至普通肿瘤患者群体,因为随机临床试验纳入的癌症患者极少且经过高度筛选。此外,与LMWH(癌症相关血栓形成初始及长期治疗的首选药物)相比,这些药物的表现如何尚未得到评估。对癌症患者尤为重要的其他限制因素,如化疗相互作用、肾功能损害或伴有转移的肝脏受累,也需要仔细考虑,因为这些患者复发血栓形成和出血的风险更高。目前国际共识指南不推荐使用NOACs,但正在进行的临床试验正在对其进行探索。人们急切期待试验结果。