Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 3;160(11):774-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-0083.
Nearly 25% of patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) are readmitted within 30 days.
To assess the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and harms of transitional care interventions to reduce readmission and mortality rates for adults hospitalized with HF.
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (1 January 1990 to late October 2013).
Two reviewers independently selected randomized, controlled trials published in English reporting a readmission or mortality rate within 6 months of an index hospitalization.
One reviewer extracted data, and another checked accuracy. Two reviewers assessed risk of bias and graded strength of evidence (SOE).
Forty-seven trials were included. Most enrolled adults with moderate to severe HF and a mean age of 70 years. Few trials reported 30-day readmission rates. At 30 days, a high-intensity home-visiting program reduced all-cause readmission and the composite end point (all-cause readmission or death; low SOE). Over 3 to 6 months, home-visiting programs and multidisciplinary heart failure (MDS-HF) clinic interventions reduced all-cause readmission (high SOE). Home-visiting programs reduced HF-specific readmission and the composite end point (moderate SOE). Structured telephone support (STS) interventions reduced HF-specific readmission (high SOE) but not all-cause readmissions (moderate SOE). Home-visiting programs, MDS-HF clinics, and STS interventions produced a mortality benefit. Neither telemonitoring nor primarily educational interventions reduced readmission or mortality rates.
Few trials reported 30-day readmission rates. Usual care was heterogeneous and sometimes not adequately described.
Home-visiting programs and MDS-HF clinics reduced all-cause readmission and mortality; STS reduced HF-specific readmission and mortality. These interventions should receive the greatest consideration by systems or providers seeking to implement transitional care interventions for persons with HF.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
近 25%因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者在 30 天内再次入院。
评估过渡性护理干预措施在降低 HF 住院患者再入院率和死亡率方面的疗效、比较效果和危害。
MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(1990 年 1 月至 2013 年 10 月底)。
两位审查员独立选择了以英文发表的、报告索引住院后 6 个月内再入院或死亡率的随机对照试验。
一位审查员提取数据,另一位审查员检查准确性。两位审查员评估了偏倚风险并对证据强度(SOE)进行了分级。
共纳入 47 项试验。大多数试验纳入了中重度 HF 的成年患者,平均年龄为 70 岁。很少有试验报告 30 天再入院率。在 30 天时,高强度家庭访视方案降低了全因再入院率和复合终点(全因再入院或死亡;低 SOE)。在 3 至 6 个月时,家庭访视方案和多学科心力衰竭(MDS-HF)诊所干预降低了全因再入院率(高 SOE)。家庭访视方案降低了心力衰竭特异性再入院率和复合终点(中度 SOE)。结构化电话支持(STS)干预降低了心力衰竭特异性再入院率(高 SOE),但不能降低全因再入院率(中度 SOE)。家庭访视方案、MDS-HF 诊所和 STS 干预措施均带来了生存获益。远程监测和主要以教育为基础的干预措施均未降低再入院率或死亡率。
很少有试验报告 30 天再入院率。常规护理方案存在异质性,有时未充分描述。
家庭访视方案和 MDS-HF 诊所降低了全因再入院率和死亡率;STS 降低了心力衰竭特异性再入院率和死亡率。对于寻求为 HF 患者实施过渡性护理干预的系统或提供者来说,这些干预措施应得到最大的考虑。
美国医疗保健研究与质量局。