Klapper Jacob, Hirji Sameer, Hartwig Matthew G, D'Amico Thomas A, Harpole David H, Onaitis Mark W, Berry Mark F
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.062. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
Pneumonectomy for benign disease is often complicated by inflammatory processes that obscure operative planes. We reviewed our experience to evaluate the impact of requiring urgent or emergent pneumonectomy on outcomes.
All pneumonectomies for benign conditions from 1997 to 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Mortality was assessed using multivariable logistic regression that included laterality, age, and surgery status, which was emergent if performed within 24 hours of initial evaluation, urgent if performed after 24 hours but within the same hospital stay, and otherwise elective.
Among 42 pneumonectomies, completion pneumonectomy after previous ipsilateral lung resection was performed in 14 patients (33%). Resection was elective in 22 patients (52%), urgent in 12 (28%), and emergent in 8 (19%). The most common indication was for necrotic lung (n = 12; 29%). Muscle flaps were used in 26 patients (62%). Perioperative mortality for the entire cohort was 29% (n = 12) and was significantly higher when surgery was urgent (5 of 12; 42%) or emergent (5 of 8; 62.5%) compared with elective (2 of 22; 9.1%) (p = 0.03). Requiring urgent or emergent surgery remained a significant predictor of mortality in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 10.4, p = 0.01).
Pneumonectomy for benign disease has significant risk for mortality, particularly when not performed electively. Although surgery cannot be planned in the setting of trauma or some situations of acute infection, patients known to have conditions that are likely to require pneumonectomy should be considered for surgery earlier in their disease course, before developing an acute problem that requires urgent or emergent resection.
良性疾病的肺切除术常因炎症过程而变得复杂,这些炎症会模糊手术平面。我们回顾了我们的经验,以评估急症或紧急肺切除术对手术结果的影响。
对1997年至2012年在一家机构进行的所有良性疾病肺切除术进行回顾性研究。使用多变量逻辑回归评估死亡率,该回归包括手术侧别、年龄和手术状态,若在初次评估后24小时内进行手术则为紧急手术,若在24小时后但在同一住院期间进行手术则为急症手术,否则为择期手术。
在42例肺切除术中,14例患者(33%)在先前同侧肺切除术后进行了全肺切除术。22例患者(52%)的手术为择期手术,12例(28%)为急症手术,8例(19%)为紧急手术。最常见的指征是坏死肺(n = 12;29%)。26例患者(62%)使用了肌瓣。整个队列的围手术期死亡率为29%(n = 12),与择期手术(22例中的2例;9.1%)相比,急症手术(12例中的5例;42%)或紧急手术(8例中的5例;62.5%)时的死亡率显著更高(p = 0.03)。在多变量分析中,需要急症或紧急手术仍然是死亡率的显著预测因素(比值比10.4,p = 0.01)。
良性疾病的肺切除术有显著的死亡风险,尤其是在非择期进行时。虽然在创伤或某些急性感染情况下无法计划手术,但对于已知可能需要肺切除术的患者,应在其疾病进程中更早地考虑手术,即在出现需要急症或紧急切除的急性问题之前。