Fedele P L, Avery S, Patil S, Spencer A, Haas M, Wei A
Department of Clinical Haematology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2014 Aug;44(8):757-63. doi: 10.1111/imj.12478.
Induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is one of the most resource-intensive cancer therapies delivered in hospitals.
To assess the health resource impact of different chemotherapy approaches for AML commonly used in Australia.
A retrospective analysis was undertaken in 63 patients aged 18-55 years with AML given induction with either 7 + 3 (cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) days 1-7 and idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) days 1-3) or HiDAC-3 (high-dose cytarabine 3 g/m(2) twice daily days 1, 3, 5 and 7 and idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) days 1-3) chemotherapy. Average costs of hospitalisation, pathology, radiology, chemotherapy and ancillary drugs were calculated and compared with current Victorian casemix funding. Two consolidation approaches, HiDAC (cytarabine 3 g/m(2) twice daily days 1, 3, 5 and 7) × either three or four cycles (following 7 + 3) and IcE (idarubicin 12,mg/m(2) days 1-2, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) × 5 days and etoposide 75 mg/m(2) × 5 days) × 2 cycles (following HiDAC-3) were modelled, using a policy of discharge following completion of chemotherapy with outpatient monitoring.
The cost (in AUD) of induction was similar between 7 + 3 ($58,037) and HiDAC-3 ($56,902), with bed day costs accounting for 61-62% of the total expense. Blood bank costs ranked second, accounting for 15%. Accumulated costs for HiDAC consolidation were $44,289 for a three-cycle protocol and $59,052 for four cycles ($14,763 per cycle) versus $31,456 for two cycles of IcE consolidation ($15,728 per cycle). Overall, the classical 7 + 3 → HiDAC approach ($102,326/$117,089 for three or four consolidation cycles) incurs a greater cost than a HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2 approach ($88,358). For patients requiring complete hospitalisation until neutrophil recovery, the estimated costs of treatment will be even higher, ranging between $122,282 for HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2, $153,212 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3 and $184,937 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4. State-based casemix funding for non-complicated AML therapy is currently $74,013 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4, $64,177 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3 and $54,340 for HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2 based on outpatient recovery after consolidation chemotherapy. These calculations do not take into account additional resource implications associated with complications of consolidation chemotherapy or reinduction for treatment failure.
Regimens minimising the total number of chemotherapy cycles may represent the most efficient use of limited health resources for the treatment of AML.
急性髓系白血病(AML)的诱导化疗是医院中资源消耗最大的癌症治疗方法之一。
评估澳大利亚常用的不同AML化疗方法对健康资源的影响。
对63例年龄在18至55岁之间接受诱导化疗的AML患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者接受了7 + 3方案(阿糖胞苷100 mg/m²,第1 - 7天,伊达比星12 mg/m²,第1 - 3天)或HiDAC - 3方案(高剂量阿糖胞苷3 g/m²,每日2次,第1、3、5和7天,伊达比星12 mg/m²,第1 - 3天)化疗。计算住院、病理、放射、化疗及辅助药物的平均费用,并与当前维多利亚州病例组合资金进行比较。对两种巩固治疗方案进行建模,即HiDAC(阿糖胞苷3 g/m²,每日2次,第1、3、5和7天)× 3或4个周期(7 + 3方案之后)以及IcE(伊达比星12 mg/m²,第1 - 2天,阿糖胞苷100 mg/m² × 5天,依托泊苷75 mg/m² × 5天)× 2个周期(HiDAC - 3方案之后),采用化疗完成后出院并进行门诊监测的策略。
7 + 3方案(58,037澳元)和HiDAC - 3方案(56,902澳元)诱导化疗的费用相似,床位日费用占总费用的61% - 62%。血库费用排第二,占15%。HiDAC巩固治疗三个周期的累计费用为44,289澳元,四个周期为59,052澳元(每个周期14,763澳元),而IcE巩固治疗两个周期的费用为31,456澳元(每个周期15,728澳元)。总体而言,经典的7 + 3 → HiDAC方案(三个或四个巩固周期分别为102,326澳元/117,089澳元)比HiDAC - 3 → IcE × 2方案(88,358澳元)成本更高。对于需要完全住院直至中性粒细胞恢复的患者而言,估计治疗费用会更高,HiDAC - 3 → IcE × 2方案为122,282澳元,7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3方案为153,212澳元,7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4方案为184,937澳元。基于巩固化疗后门诊恢复情况计算得出,目前针对非复杂性AML治疗的州病例组合资金,7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4方案为74,013澳元,7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3方案为64,177澳元,HiDAC -