Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, University of Washington, Seattle2Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington3now with Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Department of Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Med.
Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1120-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2969.
Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) typically remain hospitalized after induction or salvage chemotherapy until blood cell count recovery, with resulting prolonged inpatient stays being a primary driver of health care costs. Pilot studies suggest that outpatient management following chemotherapy might be safe and could reduce costs for these patients.
To compare safety, resource utilization, infections, and costs between adults discharged early following AML or MDS induction or salvage chemotherapy and inpatient controls.
Nonrandomized, phase 2, single-center study conducted at the University of Washington Medical Center. Over a 43-month period (January 1, 2011, through July 31, 2014), 178 adults receiving intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy were enrolled. After completion of chemotherapy, 107 patients met predesignated medical and logistical criteria for early discharge, while 29 met medical criteria only and served as inpatient controls.
Early-discharge patients were released from the hospital at the completion of chemotherapy, and supportive care was provided in the outpatient setting until blood cell count recovery (median, 21 days; range, 2-45 days). Controls received inpatient supportive care (median, 16 days; range, 3-42 days).
We analyzed differences in early mortality, resource utilization including intensive care unit (ICU) days, transfusions per study day, and use of intravenous (IV) antibiotics per study day), numbers of infections, and total and inpatient charges per study day among early-discharge patients vs controls.
Four of the 107 early-discharge patients and none of the 29 control patients died within 30 days of enrollment (P=.58). Nine early-discharge patients (8%) but no controls required ICU-level care (P=.20). No differences were noted in the median daily number of transfused red blood cell units (0.27 vs 0.29; P=.55) or number of transfused platelet units (0.26 vs 0.29; P=.31). Early-discharge patients had more positive blood cultures (37 [35%] vs 4 [14%]; P=.04) but required fewer IV antibiotic days per study day (0.48 vs 0.71; P=.01). Overall, daily charges among early-discharge patients were significantly lower than for inpatients (median, $3840 vs $5852; P<.001) despite increased charges per inpatient day when readmitted (median, $7405 vs $5852; P<.001).
Early discharge following intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy can reduce costs and use of IV antibiotics, but attention should be paid to complications that may occur in the outpatient setting.
急性髓系白血病(AML)或骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者在诱导或挽救化疗后通常仍需住院,直至血细胞计数恢复,这导致住院时间延长,是医疗保健成本的主要驱动因素。试点研究表明,化疗后门诊管理可能是安全的,并可能降低这些患者的成本。
比较 AML 或 MDS 诱导或挽救化疗后早期出院的成年人与住院对照组之间的安全性、资源利用、感染和成本。
2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 7 月 31 日,在华盛顿大学医学中心进行了一项非随机、2 期、单中心研究。在此期间,纳入了 178 名接受强化 AML 或 MDS 化疗的成年人。化疗完成后,107 名患者符合预先指定的医疗和后勤出院标准,而 29 名患者仅符合医疗标准,作为住院对照组。
早期出院患者在化疗完成后出院,在门诊接受支持性治疗,直至血细胞计数恢复(中位数 21 天;范围 2-45 天)。对照组接受住院支持性治疗(中位数 16 天;范围 3-42 天)。
我们分析了早期死亡率、资源利用(包括重症监护病房(ICU)天数、研究日每单位输注的红细胞数和研究日每单位输注的静脉内(IV)抗生素数)、感染数量以及早期出院患者与对照组的研究日总费用和住院费用之间的差异。
107 名早期出院患者中有 4 名(4%)和 29 名对照组患者均无在入组后 30 天内死亡(P =.58)。9 名早期出院患者(8%)但无对照组患者需要 ICU 级护理(P =.20)。在接受的红细胞单位输注中位数(0.27 与 0.29;P =.55)或血小板单位输注中位数(0.26 与 0.29;P =.31)方面,两组间无差异。早期出院患者的血培养阳性率更高(37[35%]与 4[14%];P =.04),但研究日每单位 IV 抗生素使用天数更少(0.48 与 0.71;P =.01)。尽管重新入院时每天的住院费用更高(中位数 7405 美元与 5852 美元;P<.001),但早期出院患者的每日费用明显低于住院患者(中位数 3840 美元与 5852 美元;P<.001)。
AML 或 MDS 化疗后早期出院可降低成本和 IV 抗生素的使用,但应注意门诊治疗可能发生的并发症。